Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ROGER WOOD FOODS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of ROGER WOOD FOODS, INC. in 7 ALFRED STREET, SAVANNAH, GA 31408 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 341949527.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Roger Wood Foods, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Roger Wood Foods, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
7 ALFRED STREET
City
SAVANNAH
State
GA
ZIP
31408
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2926, SAVANNAH, GA 31402
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
208
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Jul 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,548 · Current $7,529 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in activities covered by this section:    a) Kitchen, Hitec Linkwel Lines # 1 through #8 - On or about February 9, 2017 and times prior to, the employer did not ensure that operators were utilizing procedures for the control of hazardous energy while performing servicing and/or maintenance work to prepare the Linkwel machines for sanitation processes, thus exposing employees to caught-in and pinch point hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7528.8
  • — Z (S) $12548

1910.147 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Jul 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(1): Before an authorized or affected employee runs off a machine or equipment, the authorized employee did not have knowledge of the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled, and the method or means to control the energy:    a) Kitchen, Hitec Linkwel Lines # 1 through #8 - On or about February 9, 2017 and times prior to, employees were not familiar with the type and magnitude of the energy, the hazards of the energy to be controlled and the method or means to control the energy while performing servicing and/or maintenance work to prepare the Linkwel machines for sanitation processes, thus exposing employees to caught-in and pinch point hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Jul 5, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees.    a) Throughout Facility - On or about February 9, 2017 and at times prior to, authorized employees cleaned equipment and did not affix a lockout device to energy isolating device(s) prior to starting service and maintenance, thus exposing employees to caught-in, pinch point, and crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,548 · Current $7,529 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct an annual or more frequent inspection of the energy control procedure to ensure that the procedure and requirements of this standard were followed:     a) Throughout Facility - On or about February 9, 2017 and times prior to, the employer had not conducted an inspection of the energy control procedures on an annual or more frequent basis.  In addition, the employer did not ensure that all authorized employees were identified; all authorized employees were properly following the energy control procedures; or that adequate group lockout/tagout procedures had been implemented, thus exposing employees to caught-in, pinch point and crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $7528.8
  • — Z (S) $12548

1910.147 F03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Aug 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,548 · Current $7,529 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(f)(3)(i): A procedure was not utilized to afford the employees a level of protection equivalent to that provided by the implementation of a personal lockout or tagout device when servicing and/or maintenance was performed by a crew, craft, department, or other group:    a) Throughout Facility - On or about February 9, 2017 and times prior to, the employer had not implemented group lockout/tagout procedures when servicing and/or maintenance on equipment was performed by a group of employees, thus exposing employees to caught-in, pinch point, and crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7528.8
  • — Z (S) $12548

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Jul 13, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,548 · Current $7,529 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.    a) Kitchen, Hitec Linkwel Lines # 1 through #8 - On or about November 27, 2016 and times prior to, employees operating the Linkwel machines to fill sausage casings were exposed to being caught-in the unguarded horn and chuck on the machines.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $7528.8
  • — Z (S) $12548

1910.303 B02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,172 · Current $4,303 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling:    a) Spice Room -  On or about, February 8, 2017 and at times prior to, forklift operators used two EnForcer SCR EnerSys Industrial Battery Chargers that were not installed and used per the manufacturer's safe operating procedures, in that the battery chargers were stored on combustible material such as wooden pallets, thus exposing employees to a fire hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $4303.2
  • — Z (S) $7172

1910.147 C05 II D

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2017
Abate by
Jun 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s):  a) Grinding Room - On or about February 9, 2017 and times prior to, the employees identity were not included on the lockout/tagout devices, thus exposing employees to caught-in and crushed-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Roger Wood Foods, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341949527.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.