Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M & J SALVAGE CORP.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M & J SALVAGE CORP. in 1617 BLACK LANE, CASEYVILLE, IL 62232 (NAICS 423140). OSHA activity number 341963080.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M & J Salvage Corp. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M & J Salvage Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M & J SALVAGE CORP.
Site address
1617 BLACK LANE
City
CASEYVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
62232
Mailing
1617 BLACK LANE, CASEYVILLE, IL 62232
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
423140
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 D02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(2)(i): Approved containers and portable tanks were not used:    Fuel removal area: Employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards when the employer did not provide approved fuel storage tanks.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1358
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.106 D02 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(2)(ii): Each portable tank was not provided with one or more devices installed in the top with sufficient emergency venting capacity to limit internal pressure under fire exposure conditions to 10 p.s.i.g., or 30 percent of the bursting pressure of the tank, whichever is greater:    Fuel Removal area:  Employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards when the employer did not provide fuel storage tanks that were adequately vented.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.106 D06 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(6)(iii): The flammable liquid storage area was not graded in a manner to divert possible spills away from buildings or other exposures or were not surrounded by a curb at least 6 inches high     Fuel Removal area: Employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards when the employer did not provide a storage area adequate to divert spills from buildings.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1358
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.106 D07 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(d)(7)(iii): Open flames and smoking were permitted in flammable liquid storage areas:    Fuel Removal area:  Employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards when the employer did not ensure open flames were eliminated or controlled.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1358
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.106 E06 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(i): Adequate precautions were not taken to prevent the ignition of flammable vapors:    Fuel Removal area:  Employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards when the employer did not ensure ignition sources were eliminated or controlled.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.106 E06 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 degree F (37.8 degree C), were dispensed into containers without the containers being electrically interconnected:    Fuel Removal area:  Employees were exposed to fire and explosion hazards when the employer did not ensure the gasoline storage tank and dispensing containers were electrically interconnected.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1358
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):    The employer did not ensure their employees had successfully completed training prior to operating powered industrial trucks.  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1358
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:      The employer did not ensure that a written hazard communication program was developed.  Employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards when draining gasoline from salvage vehicle fuel tanks.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $1358
  • — C (S) $2716
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:       The employer did not ensure that the gasoline storage tank was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and hazards warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein.  Employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:          The employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were available for each chemical.  Employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards when draining gasoline from salvage vehicle fuel tanks.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 3, 2017
Abate by
Oct 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      The employer did not ensure that employees received effective information and training on the chemicals in the work area.  Employees were exposed to fire and contact hazards.
Recent events (3)
  • — F (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341963080.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.