FLAGLER BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: TSK EXTERIORS LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TSK EXTERIORS LLC in 2253 S CENTRAL AVENUE, FLAGLER BEACH, FL 32136 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341965283.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TSK EXTERIORS LLC
- Site address
- 2253 S CENTRAL AVENUE
- City
- FLAGLER BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 32136
- Mailing
- 2044 PIRIE PLACE, SAINT CLOUD, FL 34769
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment are not used when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a. On or about December 8, 2016, two employees were using pneumatic air guns performing roofing activities without the use of safety glasses.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3741
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 4, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a. On or about December 8, 2016, on a 4:12 pitch roof, employees performing re-roofing operations, were not protected from a 18 foot fall hazard by use of a guardrail system, safety net system, personal fall arrest system or any alternative fall protection.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $3741
- — C (S) $3741
- — Z (S) $3741
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341965283.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.