FORNEY, TX —
OSHA Inspection: MIGUEL PARILLA
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MIGUEL PARILLA in 946 SPRING TOWN STREET, FORNEY, TX 75126 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341966067.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MIGUEL PARILLA
- Site address
- 946 SPRING TOWN STREET
- City
- FORNEY
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 75126
- Mailing
- 2850 EDD ROAD, DALLAS, TX 75253
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,207 · Current $3,207
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Employees performing roofing operations with no eye protection were exposed an eye hazard: (a) While using nail guns; (b) While using a circular saw
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3207
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b) (13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems, nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) Employees framing a single family residential roof were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Dec 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladders were not used only for the purpose for which they were designed: (a) Employees used a werner6-foot step ladder with the spreader closed were exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341966067.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.