Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MINESTONE CONSTRUCTION LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MINESTONE CONSTRUCTION LLC in 113 WESTON CANAL RD, HILLSBOROUGH, NJ 08844 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 341971083.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Minestone Construction LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Minestone Construction LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
113 WESTON CANAL RD
City
HILLSBOROUGH
State
NJ
ZIP
08844
Mailing
113 WESTON CANAL RD, HILLSBOROUGH, NJ 08844
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332323
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $3,622

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a) Employees performed grinding of steel members in the main fabrication shop using electric angle grinders, where personal monitoring on 1/31/2017 measured exposure to noise at 191% and 80% Dose; equivalent to 8-hour Time-weighted average of 94.6 dBA and 88.4 dBA respectively.  The employer did not implement a hearing conservation program for employees with noise exposure exceeding the values in Table D-2, to include training & audiometric testing, both initially and at least annually thereafter.  Condition(s) were noted on or about 1/31/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:   a) Air-purifying respirators with replaceable filters are provided to fabrication shop welders for protection against metal fumes during welding.  A written respiratory protection program was not developed & implemented with worksite-specific provisions covering respirator selection, care and maintenance, as well as medical clearance and training of users.   Condition(s) were noted on or about 1/31/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Air-purifying respirators with replaceable filters are provided to fabrication shop welders for protection against metal fumes during welding.  Respirator users are not evaluated by practicing licensed health care provider to determine their medical suitability for wearing a respirator.  Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2016.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $3,622
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a) Employees operated a Nissan forklift within the fabrication shop and outside lot without having completed training and practical evaluation in its safe operation, through a qualified trainer.  Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2016.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.178 Q07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $3,622
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  a) Within the fabrication shop and outside lot, employee(s) were exposed to injury when operating a Nissan forklift which was not inspected at least daily for deficiencies / conditions that would adversely affect the safety of the vehicle.  Both solid rubber rear tires exhibited numerous gouges and/or missing chunks around their perimeter that could adversely affect traveling under load; particularly on rough / uneven pavement outdoors.  Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2016.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.305 J01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $2,897
29 CFR 1910.305(j)(1)(i): Fixtures, lampholders, lamps, rosettes, and receptacles located within 8 feet of the floor had live parts exposed to employee contact:  a) Dual receptacle outlet on the wall in the outside bay at the south end of the building was located less than 8 ft above the ground and was missing the fixture faceplate cover.  Employee(s) using the outlet receptacle as power source for their Hilti portable electric angle grinder(s) were exposed to electrical shock hazard, due to exposure to energized parts.  Condition(s) were noted on or about 12/13/2016.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2897

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341971083.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.