Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ACME METALS CO.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ACME METALS CO. in 3000 GRAND AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15225 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 341971596.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Acme Metals CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Acme Metals CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ACME METALS CO.
Site address
3000 GRAND AVENUE
City
PITTSBURGH
State
PA
ZIP
15225
Mailing
3000 GRAND AVENUE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15225
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332312
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $820 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:    a) On the south end wall of the shop, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to separate a stored propane cylinder from two stored oxygen cylinders by at least 20 feet or by a fire-resistive partition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $820
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.253 B04 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.253(b)(4)(iii): Oxygen cylinders in storage were not separated from fuel-gas cylinders or combustible materials (especially oil or grease), a minimum distance of 20 feet (6.1 m) or by a noncombustible barrier at least 5 feet (1.5 m) high having a fire-resistance rating of at least one-half hour:  a) On the south end wall of the shop, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to separate a stored propane cylinder from two stored oxygen cylinders by at least 20 feet or by a fire-resistive partition.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Abate by
Jul 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $820 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:    a) At the facility, on or about December 14, 2017 - The employer failed to establish a written respiratory program. Employees voluntarily wear half mask air purifying respirators while spray finishing.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $820
  • — I (S) $820
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.134 E06 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Abate by
Jul 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i): The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator:     a) At the facility, on or about December 14, 2017 - The employer failed to from a physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP) a recommendation regarding employee's ability to use a respirator. Employees voluntarily wear half mask air purifying respirators while spray finishing.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $0
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,086 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:    a) In the Spray Finishing Area, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to protect employees spray finishing from arc welding rays created by an employee flux cored welding in an adjacent area without noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1086
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Abate by
Jul 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $824 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:    a) At the facility, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program. Employees spray finish stair stringers with flammable liquids.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $824
  • — I (S) $824
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Abate by
May 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s):  a) At the facility, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to ensure that the safety data sheet for Sherwin-Williams Shopcoat Primer, Gray, was readily accessible to employees spray finishing with the primer in the shop.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Abate by
Jul 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify, through a written certification, that the required workplace hazard assessment had been performed:      a) At the facility, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to verify that the workplace hazard assessment was performed.
Recent events (3)
  • — P (O) $0
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.133 A01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
May 8, 2017
Abate by
May 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  a) At the facility, on or about December 14, 2016 - The employer failed to provide appropriate eye protection to employees who use angle grinders on metal.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Acme Metals CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341971596.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.