ALPHARETTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: GENARO HERNANDEZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GENARO HERNANDEZ in 12725 RUTH'S FARM WAY, ALPHARETTA, GA 30009 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341972545.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GENARO HERNANDEZ
- Site address
- 12725 RUTH'S FARM WAY
- City
- ALPHARETTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30009
- Mailing
- 8430 KNOX BRIDGE HWY., CANTON, GA 30114
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238170
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents: (a) New residential construction located on Lot #11, Front side: On or about December 14, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to struck-by hazards while operating pneumatic finish nail guns at 120 PSI, in that safety glasses or other eye protection was not provided to employees installing cornice boards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.404 F06
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous: (a) New residential construction located at Lot #11, Front side: On or about December 14, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards, in that the 50-ft extension cord used to power a Makita circular saw was missing a ground pin.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2173
1926.405 G02 IV
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.405(g)(2)(iv): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief is provided to prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: (a) New residential construction located on Lot #11, Work bench: Employees were exposed to electrical shock hazards while using Makita circular saws, in that the electrical cords provided had damaged strain relief which exposed employees to live internal circuits in wet conditions.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.416 E01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(e)(1): Worn or frayed electric cords or cables were used: (a) New residential construction located on Lot #11, Work bench area: On or about December 14, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to electrical shock hazards while operating circular saws with damaged electrical cords, in that the cords were torn, frayed and exposing the internal insulated wires as the conditions were wet.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: (a) New residential construction located on Lot #11, Porch roof: On or about December 14, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of 13-feet from the lower level, in that a fall protection system was not provided to employees engaged in siding activities.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jan 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: (a) New residential construction located on Lot #11, Front side: On or about December 14, 2016, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 13-feet from the roof, in that the ladder provided was not extended at least 3-feet past the landing or secured to the structure to allow for safe access on and off the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2716
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238170)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341972545.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.