BROOKLYN, NY —
OSHA Inspection: TRI-STATE SHEARING AND BENDING INC.
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRI-STATE SHEARING AND BENDING INC. in 366 HERZL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11212 (NAICS 331221). OSHA activity number 341975985.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TRI-STATE SHEARING AND BENDING INC.
- Site address
- 366 HERZL STREET
- City
- BROOKLYN
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 11212
- Mailing
- 366 HERZL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11212
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331221
- Employees
- 21
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2017
- Abate by
- May 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,577 · Current $3,577 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to noise hazards because the employer failed to implement an effective and continuing hearing conservation program. The following are instances where the time-weighted average exceeded 85 dBA: (1) A shop guy assigned to the forklift was exposed to 90.38% of the dose, which is equivalent to 89.2 dBA during a period of 438 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 42 minutes. (2) A shop guy assigned to the press break was exposed to 111.2% of the dose, which is equivalent to 90.7 dBA during a period of 395 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 85 minutes.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3577
- — Z (S) $5577
1910.252 B02 III
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2017
- Abate by
- May 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,984 · Current $2,084 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields: (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to fire and thermal hazards because the employer failed to ensure that flameproof screens or shields adequately protected employees working adjacent to the plasma cutter.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2084
- — Z (S) $3984
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2017
- Abate by
- May 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,187 · Current $1,987 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to chemical hazards because the employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program where employees handled flammable paints and liquid propane gas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1987
- — Z (S) $3187
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Apr 13, 2017
- Abate by
- May 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to chemical hazards because the employer failed to train shop guys on the hazards of the LPG, paint, and hydraulic fluid that they used in the work area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Tri-State Shearing and Bending INC.
View Tri-State Shearing and Bending INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331221)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341975985.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.