Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TRI-STATE SHEARING AND BENDING INC.

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TRI-STATE SHEARING AND BENDING INC. in 366 HERZL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11212 (NAICS 331221). OSHA activity number 341975985.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tri-State Shearing and Bending INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tri-State Shearing and Bending INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
366 HERZL STREET
City
BROOKLYN
State
NY
ZIP
11212
Mailing
366 HERZL STREET, BROOKLYN, NY 11212
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331221
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2017
Abate by
May 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,577 · Current $3,577 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:    (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to noise hazards because the employer failed to implement an effective and continuing hearing conservation program. The following are instances where the time-weighted average exceeded 85 dBA:        (1) A shop guy assigned to the forklift was exposed to 90.38% of the dose, which is equivalent to 89.2 dBA during a period of 438 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 42 minutes.         (2) A shop guy assigned to the press break was exposed to 111.2% of the dose, which is equivalent to 90.7 dBA during a period of 395 minutes. Zero exposure was assumed for 85 minutes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3577
  • — Z (S) $5577

1910.252 B02 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2017
Abate by
May 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,984 · Current $2,084 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.252(b)(2)(iii): Workers and other persons adjacent to the welding area were not protected from the rays by noncombustible or flameproof screens or shields:    (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to fire and thermal hazards because the employer failed to ensure that flameproof screens or shields adequately protected employees working adjacent to the plasma cutter.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2084
  • — Z (S) $3984

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2017
Abate by
May 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,187 · Current $1,987 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):     (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to chemical hazards because the employer failed to develop a written hazard communication program where employees handled flammable paints and liquid propane gas.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1987
  • — Z (S) $3187

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Apr 13, 2017
Abate by
May 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) On or about 1/9/2017, employees of Tri-State Shearing and Bending were exposed to chemical hazards because the employer failed to train shop guys on the hazards of the LPG, paint, and hydraulic fluid that they used in the work area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Tri-State Shearing and Bending INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341975985.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.