Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LEWIS STEEL WORKS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of LEWIS STEEL WORKS, INC. in 613 SOUTH MAIN STREET, WRENS, GA 30833 (NAICS 332420). OSHA activity number 341976272.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lewis Steel Works, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lewis Steel Works, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
613 SOUTH MAIN STREET
City
WRENS
State
GA
ZIP
30833
Mailing
P.O. BOX 338, WRENS, GA 30833
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332420
Employees
80
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $5,324 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(ii): Prior to permitting an employee to operate a powered industrial truck (except for training purposes), the employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training required by paragraph (l):    a) Throughout Yard/Facility - On or about October 4, 2016 and times prior to, the employer did not ensure that all employees who operated powered industrial trucks (PITs) had successfully completed the training required by this paragraph (l) before allowing the employee(s) to operate a PIT, thus exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5323.8
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.178 L03 II I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(ii)(I): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training in other unique or potentially hazardous conditions of the workplace that could affect safe operation:  Throughout Yard/Facility - October 4, 2016, the employer did ensure that powered industrial truck operators were sufficiently trained to recognize and understand the hazards associated with utilizing powered industrial trucks to lift or raise up other powered industrial trucks that had become stuck in gravel, mud, or other outdoors terrain, thus exposing employees to potential crushed-by or struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s):    a) Throughout Yard - On or about December 15, 2016 and times prior, employees had reduced visibility while operating the JCB powered industrial truck (forklift) #8 around the outside of the facility with one inoperable headlight, and one inoperable rear light, thus exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1904.29 B01

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2017
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,268 · Current $761 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(1): A Log of all recordable work-related injuries and illnesses (OSHA Form 300 or equivalent) was not completed in the detail as required by the regulation:    a) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, OSHA Form 300, case number 11, injury date 08.30.2016 was inadequate in that: the information in column (E) did not provide specific detail to as to where the event occurred in the plant and column (F) did not adequately describe the injury or illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill.    b) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, OSHA Form 300, case number 12, injury date 10.04.2016 was inadequate in that: the information in column (E) did not provide specific detail to as to where the event occurred in the plant; column (F) did not adequately describe the injury or illness to the leg; and the information in column (K) did not signify the number of days away from work thus far.    c) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, OSHA Form 300, case number 13, injury date 10.05.2016 was inadequate in that: the information in column (E) did not provide specific detail to as to where the event occurred in the plant and column (F) did not adequately describe the injury or illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill.    d) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, OSHA Form 300, case number 15, injury date 10.11.2016, was inadequate in that: the information in column (E) did not provide specific detail to as to where the event occurred in the plant; column (F) did not adequately describe the injury or illness and the object/substance that directly injured or made person ill.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $760.8
  • — Z (O) $1268

1904.29 B02

Other-than-serious 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2017
Abate by
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,268 · Current $761 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.29(b)(2): The employer did not fill out or correctly fill out an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for each recordable injury or illness:    a) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for injury date 08.30.2016 was filled out incorrectly for the 2016 calendar year in that the following information was missing:     Date employee was hired;   Sex of the employee;   Address of facility where treatment was given;   Whether or not employee was treated in the emergency room;   Whether or not employee was hospitalized overnight as an in-patient;   Case number from the OSHA 300 Log;   Time employee began work;   Time of the event;   Description of the activity employee was doing just before the incident occurred;   How the injury occurred.    b) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for injury date 10.04.2016 was filled out incorrectly for the 2016 calendar year in that the following information was missing:     Address of facility where treatment was given;   Case number from the OSHA 300 Log;   Time employee began work;  Time of the event.    c) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for injury date 10.05.2016 was filled out incorrectly for the 2016 calendar year in that the following information was missing:     Date employee was hired;   Sex of the employee;   Address of facility where treatment was given;   Whether or not employee was treated in the emergency room;   Whether or not employee was hospitalized overnight as an in-patient;   Case number from the OSHA 300 Log;   Time employee began work;  Time of the event;   Description of the activity employee was doing just before the incident occurred;   How the injury occurred.    d) Facility - On or about December 14, 2016, an OSHA Form 301 or equivalent for injury date 10.11.2016 was filled out incorrectly for the 2016 calendar year in that the following information was missing:     Whether or not employee was treated in the emergency room;   Whether or not employee was hospitalized overnight as an in-patient;   Case number from the OSHA 300 Log;   Time employee began work;  Time of the event;   Description of the activity employee was doing just before the incident occurred;   How the injury occurred.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $760.8
  • — Z (O) $1268

1904.39 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(3): The employer did not report an in-patient hospitalization, amputation, or loss of an eye as a result of a work-related incident to OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours:    a) At Facility - On or about October 5, 2016, the employer did not report a hospitalization within 24 hours of an incident involving an employee who sustained serious injuries after a forklift tipped over on their leg.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2100
  • — Z (O) $3500

View Lewis Steel Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341976272.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.