Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: 1366 TECHNOLOGIES, INC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of 1366 TECHNOLOGIES, INC in 6 PRESTON COURT, BEDFORD, MA 01730 (NAICS 334413). OSHA activity number 341986719.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch 1366 Technologies, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for 1366 Technologies, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
6 PRESTON COURT
City
BEDFORD
State
MA
ZIP
01730
Mailing
6 PRESTON COURT, BEDFORD, MA 01730
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334413
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:     (a) Location - 6 Preston Court, Bedford, MA:   On or about 12/21/16, the employer failed to protect employees from fall hazards when working on a roof.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.157 D06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2017
Abate by
May 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,338 · Current $2,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.157(d)(6): The employer did not distribute portable fire extinguishers or other containers of Class D extinguishing agent for use by employees so that the travel distance from the combustible metal working area to any extinguishing agent is 75 feet (22.9 m) or less:     (a) Location - 6 Preston Court, Bedford, MA:   On or about 12/21/16, the employer failed to ensure that a Class D fire extinguisher was available when cutting aluminum with a milling machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2000
  • — Z (S) $6338

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $5,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    (a) Location - 6 Preston Court, Bedford, MA:  On or about 12/21/16, the employer failed to guard milling machines and ovens when employees were working in areas of point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5000
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.303 B01 IV

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $3,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1)(iv): Electric equipment was not free from the recognized hazard of damaged insulation.     (a) Location - 6 Preston Court Bedford, MA:   On or about 1/10/17, the employer failed to ensure that an electrical cord was free of damage.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.305 A02 I B

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(i)(B): Temporary wiring was used for a period exceeding 90 days.   (a) Location - 6 Preston Court, Bedford, MA: On or about 12/21/16, the employer failed to ensure that a temporary extension cord was used less than 90 days.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.335 A01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Apr 25, 2017
Abate by
May 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $711 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.335(a)(1)(ii): Protective equipment was not maintained in a safe, reliable condition and/or was not periodically inspected or tested:     (a) Location - 6 Preston Court, Bedford, MA:   On or about 12/21/16, the employer failed to ensure that electrical safety gloves employees were using were inspected as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $400
  • — Z (O) $711

View 1366 Technologies, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341986719.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.