HAMPDEN, ME —
OSHA Inspection: UNIVERSAL DETAILING
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of UNIVERSAL DETAILING in 1 AMMO INDUSTRIAL PARK, HAMPDEN, ME 04444 (NAICS 811192). OSHA activity number 341987873.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNIVERSAL DETAILING
- Site address
- 1 AMMO INDUSTRIAL PARK
- City
- HAMPDEN
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04444
- Mailing
- 1 AMMO INDUSTRIAL PARK, BANGOR, ME 04401
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811192
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.37 B05
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(5): Each doorway or passage along an exit access that could be mistaken for an exit was not marked "Not an Exit" or similar designation, or be identified by a sign indicating its actual use (e.g. closet): Main Shop, Northeast Wall - Two doors were not marked with "Not an Exit" signs or identified by signs as to their actual uses.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use: Main Shop - The Sellstrom Gravit-Eye eyewash station had no fluid in it and had not been serviced within six months.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 C01
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(c)(1): Portable fire extinguishers were not provided, mounted, located and identified so that they were readily accessible without subjecting the employees to injuries: Main Shop - There were no portable fire extinguishers available for employee use in the facility.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.242 A
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 19, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.242(a): Hand and portable powered tools or equipment were not kept in safe condition: Portable power tools were not kept in safe condition, in the following instances: a) Main Shop - The switch on the Malco Xtrax Extractor (S/N 4661) was not properly mounted, and the cord was not provided with strain relief. b) Main Shop - The On/Off switch on the Alkota Pressure Washer, (S/N 198839) was not properly mounted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords and cables were not connected to devices and fittings so that strain relief was provided that would prevent pull from being directly transmitted to joints or terminal screws: Main Shop - An extension cord was not provided with strain relief.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,496 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program which included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): Facility - The employer had not developed, implemented or maintained a written hazard communication program to protect workers from the hazards associated with hazardous chemicals used in the workplace.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1496
- — Z (S) $2138
1910.151 B
- Issued
- Jan 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(b): First aid supplies approved by a consulting physician were not readily available: Facility - First aid kits throughout the facility were depleted of their most used supplies.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811192)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341987873.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.