LIVERPOOL, NY —
OSHA Inspection: FUCCILLO KIA OF CLAY
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FUCCILLO KIA OF CLAY in 3885 ROUTE 31, LIVERPOOL, NY 13090 (NAICS 441110). OSHA activity number 341991412.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FUCCILLO KIA OF CLAY
- Site address
- 3885 ROUTE 31
- City
- LIVERPOOL
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13090
- Mailing
- 3885 ROUTE 31, LIVERPOOL, NY 13090
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 441110
- Employees
- 51
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $3,296 Reduced
2037
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (a) At the facility shop areas, on or about 12/19/2016: There was no written respiratory protection program established or implemented where employees wore half face respirators for undercoat/spray operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3295.5
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2037
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Note: The employer may discontinue an employee's medical evaluations when the employee is no longer required to use a respirator. (a) At the facility shop areas, on or about 12/19/2016: The employer did not provide medical examinations where employees wore half face respirators for undercoat/spray operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2037
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: (a) At the facility shop areas, on or about 12/19/2016: The employer did not insure fit testing was done for employees who wore half face respirators for undercoat/spray operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 G01 I A
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2037
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function: (a) At the facility shop areas, on or about 12/19/2016: There were employees wearing half face respirators for undercoat/spray operations who had beards which impeded proper respirator fit.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
2037
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: (a) At the facility shop areas, on or about 12/19/2016: The employer did not insure that respirator training was done for employees who wore half face respirators for undercoat/spray operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 G08
- Issued
- Feb 23, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,802 · Current $2,471 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that Safety Data Sheets were readily accessible during each work shift to employees when they were in their work area(s) (a) At the facility, on or about 12/19/2016: The employer had an electronic system for Safety Data Sheets, but employees were not trained or able to access the information during their work shift or when they were in their work areas. Abatement certification must be submitted.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2471.3
- — Z (S) $3802
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 441110)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341991412.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.