Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RED ROOFING

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RED ROOFING in 135 4TH STREET, DELTA, CO 81416 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341995280.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch RED Roofing — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for RED Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RED ROOFING
Site address
135 4TH STREET
City
DELTA
State
CO
ZIP
81416
Mailing
646 MT JULIAN DRIVE, GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81504
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure employees were wearing hard hats to be protected from the hazard of falling objects on a steep roof.  Employees were using forks to tear off roof shingles from a 18/12 steep pitched roof. Employees were working beneath each other on the roof, and on the ground where falling debris presented a hazard to the employees. This condition exposed employees to head injury from being struck by falling tools and materials.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $978
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $978 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:    (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure employees were wearing safety glasses when using pneumatic nail guns while sheathing, and while using forks to tear off wood shingles. This condition exposed employees to the hazards of projectiles to the eyes and from being struck by sharp objects.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $978
  • — Z (S) $1630

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt was not worn and a lanyard attached to the boom or basket when working from an aerial lift:    (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure that a body belt of lanyard was attached to the boom or bucket when working from an aerial lift. Two employees were working on a Genie S-85 aerial lift while sheathing without connecting to the aerial lift. Condition exposed employees to a fall hazard of approximately 30 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1630
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.501 B11

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure employees were protected from falling through the use of appropriate fall protection.  The employees were sheathing and tearing off shingles on a 18/12 steep pitched roof without the use of fall protection. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 35 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2282
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2): The employer shall assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in the following areas: (i) The nature of fall hazards in the work area; (ii) The correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling, and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used; (iii) The use and operation of guardrail systems, personal fall arrest systems, safety net systems, warning line systems, safety monitoring systems, controlled access zones, and other protection to be used; (iv) The role of each employee in the safety monitoring system when this system is used; (v) The limitations on the use of mechanical equipment during the performance of roofing work on low-sloped roofs; (vi) The correct procedures for the handling and storage of equipment and materials and the erection of overhead protection; (vii) The role of employees in fall protection plans; and, (viii) The standards contained in this subpart:  (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure employees were trained by a competent person regarding the fall hazards. Employees were sheathing and tearing off shingles and were not using fall protection. The employees had not been trained regarding the fall hazards of the site. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of about 35 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,132 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): When portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access; or, when such an extension is not possible because of the ladder's length, then the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and a grasping device, such as a grabrail, shall be provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. In no case shall the extension be such that ladder deflection under a load would, by itself, cause the ladder to slip off its support:    (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure that the ladder extended at least three feet past the roof's eave. The employees used the ladder to ascend and descend from the ground to the roof. The ladder side rails did not extend three rungs up past the roof's eave and it was not secured. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of 16 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1132
  • — Z (S) $2173

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Abate by
Apr 4, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): 1926.1060(a)(1):  The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards.  (a) Red Roofing at 135 E 4th Ave Delta, CO: On 12/13/2016, the exposing employer did not ensure that the employees were trained regarding ladder safety. Employees used a ladder to access a steep-pitched roof. This condition exposed employees to fall hazards of approximately 16 feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View RED Roofing's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341995280.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.