OSHA Inspection: EDECIO ERNESTO VERDECIA-DIAZ

Issued

Feb 8, 2018

Abate by

Mar 15, 2018

Penalty

Initial $311 · Current $311

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:   The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required.    Inspection Site:  6961 Carlyle Ave. Miami Beach, FL, 33140    The employer did not provide abatement certification and documentation for inspection number 1200077, Citation 1, Item a, 29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii) and Citation 1 Item b, 29 CFR 1926.454(a) which were issued on 6/2/2017. Citations were received by employer on 6/14/2017.     Violation occurred on or about 12/28/2016

Issued

Jun 2, 2017

Abate by

Jun 9, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section:  On or about December 28, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were painting the exterior of the existing building while working on the top of the tubular mobile scaffold up to approximately 12 feet high without guardrails installed, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.

Issued

Jun 2, 2017

Abate by

Jun 9, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.  On or about December 28, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were painting the exterior of the existing building while working on the top of a tubular mobile scaffold up to approximately 12 feet high without the employer providing scaffold training, exposing the employees to a fall hazard.