Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ESVIN HAROLDO PAZ-VALDEZ DBA CHICO CONSTRUCTION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ESVIN HAROLDO PAZ-VALDEZ DBA CHICO CONSTRUCTION in 9-12 KEY STREET, MILLIS, MA 02054 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 342008406.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Esvin Haroldo Paz-Valdez DBA Chico Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Esvin Haroldo Paz-Valdez DBA Chico Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
9-12 KEY STREET
City
MILLIS
State
MA
ZIP
02054
Mailing
2114 RANDOLPH ROAD APT. 6, SILVER SPRING, MD 20902
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Abate by
Feb 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Location: Jobsite  Employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet to the ground below while working where the scaffold had not been inspected by a competent person.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3803
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Abate by
Feb 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  Location: Jobsite  Employees were exposed to falls greater than 10 feet to the ground below while working from an aluminum pole type scaffold system that had no guardrail systems, end rail systems, nor were personal fall arrest systems used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Abate by
Feb 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to falls greater than a 10 feet to the ground below while working from an aluminum pole pump jack scaffold that was not secured on the bottom  by bracing or other methods as required.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Abate by
Feb 14, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performed work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards.    Location: Jobsite    Employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet to the ground below from a scaffold platform to the ground below, where untrained employees were unable to recognize or avoid the hazards, or to wear and use personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $3803

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342008406.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.