ATLANTA, GA —
OSHA Inspection: CEMEX, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CEMEX, INC. in 2194 W. POINT, ATLANTA, GA 30337 (NAICS 327320). OSHA activity number 342009792.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CEMEX, INC.
- Site address
- 2194 W. POINT
- City
- ATLANTA
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 30337
- Mailing
- 106 BELL PARKWAY, WOODSTOCK, GA 30188
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327320
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 B02
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 24, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,149 · Current $4,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(b)(2): Every ladder rung, step, and/or cleat is not spaced less than 10 inches (25 cm) and no more than 14 inches (36 cm) apart, as measured between the centerlines of the rungs, cleats, and steps: a) Conveyor Belt Catwalk; On or about January 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to fall hazards, in that the fixed ladder used to access a catwalk was installed with rungs measured to be 16 inches apart.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4250
- — Z (S) $8149
1910.28 B01 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,149 · Current $4,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.28(b)(1)(i): Each employee on a walking-working surface with an unprotected side or edge that is 4 feet (1.2 m) or more above a lower level were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1910.28(b): a) Conveyor Belt Catwalk; On or about January 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to falls of 5 feet 3 inches at the bottom of the catwalk in that employees were exposed to unprotected sides while greasing belt fittings on the catwalk.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4250
- — Z (S) $8149
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $4,889 · Current $3,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Pull boxes, junction boxes, and fittings were not provided with covers approved for the purpose: a) Conveyor Belt: On or about January 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to shock hazards, in that an electrical outlet cover was not provided to employees while greasing conveyor belt fittings.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000
- — Z (S) $4889
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards were present, or were likely to be present, which necessitated the use of personal protective equipment: a) Throughout; On or about January 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to overhead hazards such as products falling from conveyor belts without a complete assessment of the workplace being conducted in order to determine the personal protective equipment that was needed at the site.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: a) Throughout; On or about January 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to crystalline silica sand, aggregates (Zyla 620, Daraccel), and truck wash (ECI-6799) without providing employees with information on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals while producing concrete and washing trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Feb 28, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: a) On or about January 5, 2017, and at times prior, the employer exposed employees to hazardous chemicals including, but not limited to crystalline silica sand, aggregates (Zyla 620, Daraccel), and truck wash (ECI-6799) without providing employees with Global Harmonization System information for the chemicals while producing concrete and washing trucks.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Cemex, INC.
View Cemex, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327320)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342009792.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.