Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: KERRY FLAVOR SYSTEMS (US) LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of KERRY FLAVOR SYSTEMS (US) LLC in N168 W21455 MAIN STREET, JACKSON, WI 53037 (NAICS 311211). OSHA activity number 342011541.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Kerry Flavor Systems (US) LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Kerry Flavor Systems (US) LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
N168 W21455 MAIN STREET
City
JACKSON
State
WI
ZIP
53037
Mailing
N168 W21455 MAIN STREET, JACKSON, WI 53037
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311211
Employees
315
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C06 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2017
Abate by
Jul 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,155 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:    (a) Inspection of the energy control procedures was not being done in accordance with the standard, in that the auditor was not actually present while the procedure was being done.  For example, operators, who were authorized employees, performed lockout as part of Blending Cell  Wet Wash procedures (e.g., Blending Cell 5 Organic Wet Wash Procedure).  After completion of the lockout procedure steps, the operator called over the supervisor, an authorized employee, to verify that all appropriate parts have been locked out.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $4155

1910.1000 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2017
Abate by
Dec 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,311 · Current $6,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(a)(2): Employee(s) were exposed to an airborne concentration of Total Dust, listed as Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated (PNOR)  listed in Table Z-1, in excess of the 8 hour Time Weighted Average concentration of 15mg/m3:     (a) On or around March 28, 2017, a Blender adding various ingredients to Blending Cell Two (2)  to make Mocha flavoring was exposed to Total Dust at a concentration of 18.50 mg/m3  during a 483 minute sampling period.  This exposure was approximately 1.23 times the limit of 15 mg/m3.       (b) On or around March 28, 2017,  a Blender adding various ingredients to Blending Cell Six (6)  in the Stage 1 room to make Wildberry flavoring was exposed to Total Dust at an 8-hour time weighted average of 42.51 mg/m3 , approximately 2.83 times the limit of 15 mg/m3.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 11 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6000
  • — Z (S) $8311

1910.1000 E

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2017
Abate by
Dec 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d):  (a) On or around March 28, 2017, a Blender adding various ingredients to Blending Cell Two (2) to make Mocha flavoring was exposed to Total Dust at a concentration of 18.50 mg/m3  during a 483 minute sampling period.  This exposure was approximately 1.23 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3.   Existing control measures, including administrative and engineering controls, were not adequate to limit the exposure of employees to Total Dust to or below the PEL.  (b) On or around March 28, 2017,  a Blender adding various ingredients to Blending Cell Six (6) in the Stage 1  room to make Wildberry flavoring was exposed to Total Dust at an 8-hour time weighted average of 42.51 mg/m3 , approximately 2.83 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 11 minutes not sampled.  Existing control measures, including administrative and engineering controls, were not adequate to limit the exposure of employees to Total Dust to or below the PEL.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 A02

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jun 30, 2017
Abate by
Dec 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9135

29 CFR 1910.134(a)(2): The respiratory protection program did not cover each employee required by 29 CFR 1910.134 to use a respirator:  (a)  On or around March 28, 2017, a Blender adding various ingredients to Blending Cell Two (2) to make Mocha flavoring was exposed to Total Dust (Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated) at a concentration of 18.50 mg/m3  during a 483 minute sampling period.  This exposure was approximately 1.23 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3.   Appropriate respiratory protection was not provided, in accordance with the employer's Respiratory Protection program and in accordance with the requirements of the of the Respiratory Protection standard, to protect Blenders from the respiratory hazards of airborne dust.   (b)  On or around March 28, 2017,  a Blender adding various ingredients to Blending Cell Six (6) in the Stage 1 room to make Wildberry flavoring was exposed to Total Dust (Particulates Not Otherwise Regulated) at an 8-hour time weighted average of 42.51 mg/m3 , approximately 2.83 times the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 15 mg/m3.  Exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 11 minutes not sampled.  Appropriate respiratory protection was not provided, in accordance with the employer's Respiratory Protection program and in accordance with the requirements of the of the Respiratory Protection standard, to protect Blenders from the respiratory hazards of airborne dust.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Kerry Flavor Systems (US) LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342011541.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.