OSHA Inspection: FRP ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS, LLC

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

May 8, 2017

Penalty

Initial $305 · Current $305

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  The employer did not provide abatement certification, in the following instances:  a)    Citation 1 Item 5 instance b;  b)    Citation 1 Item 6 instance b;  c)    Citation 1 Item 7; and  d)    Citation 2 Item 1.

Issued

Apr 4, 2017

Abate by

May 8, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  The employer did not submit abatement documentation in the form of photographs, receipts, reports, or programs for Citation 1 Item 5.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c): The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program with required worksite-specific procedures and elements for required respirator use:  Facility - The employer did not develop or implement a written respiratory protection program

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 16, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6):  The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  Facility - The employer did not certify that each operator was trained and evaluated on the powered industrial truck they were operating.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 16, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,173 · Current $2,173

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  Facility - The powered industrial truck was not examined for defects prior to each use.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Penalty

Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(i)(A): For electric equipment operating at 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, and likely to require examination, adjustment, servicing, or maintenance while energized, the depth of the working space in the direction of access to live parts (as measured from the live parts where they were exposed or from the enclosure front or opening where they were enclosed) was less than indicated in Table S-1 of Subpart S of Part 1910:  Panel 3 - The 480 volt panel used to energize the air compressor was blocked by a metal garbage can and not cleared to 36 inch working space.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 16, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  Employees were exposed to 480 volt energized parts, in the following instances:  a) Panel 3 - The entire cover plate was missing from the panel. b) Panel 4 - Twenty nine (29) single circuit breakers were missing from the 42 circuit panel.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 14, 2017

Penalty

Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(b)(2)(i): Each outlet box in completed installations did not have a cover, faceplate, or fixture canopy:  No faceplate or cover was on the outlet boxes, in the following instances:  a) Lay Up Room - Duplex with a switch and receptacle. b) Truck Bay - The gang box with single switch.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 28, 2017

Penalty

Initial $1,630 · Current $1,630

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  Facility - The employer did not develop or implement a written hazard communications program for employees working with hazardous chemicals such as styrene, methyl ethyl ketone, LP gas, and pneumatic tool oil.

Issued

Feb 8, 2017

Abate by

Feb 16, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:  Facility - The employer did not verify that the workplace hazard assessment had been performed.