NORWALK, CT —
OSHA Inspection: PABLO REMODELING, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of PABLO REMODELING, LLC in 14 SEASIDE PLACE, NORWALK, CT 06855 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342017928.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PABLO REMODELING, LLC
- Site address
- 14 SEASIDE PLACE
- City
- NORWALK
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06855
- Mailing
- 71 PADANARAM RD., DANBURY, CT 06810
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 E08
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(8): Direct access to or from another surface was used when the scaffold was more than 14 inches (36 cm) horizontally and/or 24 inches (61 cm) vertically from the other surface. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to walk and work from the ladder jack scaffold platform were provided with a safe means of access to the platform.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2300
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the ladder jack scaffold from that employees were required to walk and work was erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2300
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were required to walk and work from the ladder jack scaffold were trained to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 3, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was required to work on the roof at a height above 6 feet was trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to walk and work from the ladder jack scaffold were protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2300
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 6, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employee who was working on the residential roof at a height above 6 feet was protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails, safety nets or a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Pablo Remodeling, LLC
View Pablo Remodeling, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342017928.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.