BIRMINGHAM, AL —
OSHA Inspection: LC CONSTRUCTION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LC CONSTRUCTION in 2221 STERLINGWOOD DR., BIRMINGHAM, AL 35243 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342022118.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LC CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 2221 STERLINGWOOD DR.
- City
- BIRMINGHAM
- State
- AL
- ZIP
- 35243
- Mailing
- 15721 AL HWY 91 LOT # 47, HANCEVILLE, AL 35077
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $1,955 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about 1/12/2017 - at 2221 Sterlingwood Dr., Birmingham, AL - eye protection was not used when an employees was operating a Hitachi NV 65AH 2 1/2" Nail Coiler and a Rolair System Air Compressor to nail cornice exposing employees to flying particles.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1955.4
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.451 B02
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(i) and (b)(2)(ii) of this section, each scaffold platform and/or walkway was not at least 18 inches (46 cm) wide: a) On or about 1/12/2017 - at 2221 Sterlingwood Dr., Birmingham, AL - an employee performing framing was working from a makeshift scaffold platform that was approximately 10 inches wide.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.8
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section: a) On or about 1/12/2017 - at 2221 Sterlingwood Dr., Birmingham, AL - an employee was not protected from falling approximately 14 feet while performing framing operations from a makeshift scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.8
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,630 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. a) On or about 1/12/2017 - at 2221 Sterlingwood Dr., Birmingham, AL 35243, the employer did not train each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and how to minimize these hazards when working at heights on a scaffold at approximately 14 feet above the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1629.6
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: a) On or about 1/12/2017 - at 2221 Sterlingwood Dr., Birmingham, AL 35243, an employee was exposed to fall hazards of approximately 17.7 feet above ground level while installing cornice.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.8
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder: a) On or about 1/12/2017 - at 2221 Sterlingwood Dr., Birmingham, AL - a 20 foot aluminum ladder used to access the roof was not extended at least 3-feet above the upper landing surface, was not secured to a rigid support, and/or a grasping device was not provided.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.8
- — Z (S) $3803
More inspections at LC Construction
View LC Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in AL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342022118.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.