MIDLAND, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BASIN ANCHOR STEAM & PRESSURE SOLUTIONS INC.
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of BASIN ANCHOR STEAM & PRESSURE SOLUTIONS INC. in PHOENIX LEASE SERVICES INC. 8310 W. I-20, MIDLAND, TX 79706 (NAICS 213112). OSHA activity number 342023777.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BASIN ANCHOR STEAM & PRESSURE SOLUTIONS INC.
- Site address
- PHOENIX LEASE SERVICES INC. 8310 W. I-20
- City
- MIDLAND
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79706
- Mailing
- 1204 E. MAGNOLIA, MIDLAND, TX 79705
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 213112
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to clean the inside of frac tanks and exposed them to adverse health effects from exposure to chemical hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazards in the workplace such as but not limited to xylene, benzene, and trimethylbenzene, to name some, to determine the appropriate respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to use a respirator during the cleaning of acid tanks and/or working inside a confined space; exposing employees to hazardous atmospheric conditions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): The employer did not provide fit tests for employees required to use a respirator during the cleaning of acid tanks and/or working inside a confined space; exposing employees to hazardous atmospheric conditions.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.146 C04
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4): When the employer decided that its employees would enter permit spaces, the employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program that complied with 29 CFR 1910.146: The employer did not develop and implement a written permit space entry program for employees required to work inside frac tanks and exposed them to adverse health effects while working in hazardous atmospheres.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: The employer did not ensure training for employees required to work inside frac tanks and exposed them to adverse health effects while working in hazardous atmospheres.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: The employer did not have a written hazard communication program for employees required to clean the inside of frac tanks and exposed them to adverse health effects from exposure to chemical hazards such as benzene and xylene to name a few.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 213112)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342023777.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.