WACO, TX —
OSHA Inspection: SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of SANDERSON FARMS, INC. in 301 AVIATION PARKWAY, WACO, TX 76705 (NAICS 311615). OSHA activity number 342024221.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SANDERSON FARMS, INC.
- Site address
- 301 AVIATION PARKWAY
- City
- WACO
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76705
- Mailing
- 301 AVIATION PARKWAY, WACO, TX 76705
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 311615
- Employees
- 1050
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 D03 II
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii): The employer did not document that equipment complies with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices. a) On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not document compliance with its chosen recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP), ANSI/ASHRAE-15 2004, Section 8.11.2.1, as the refrigeration machinery room did not contain ammonia detectors. This condition exposed employees to inhalation of ammonia vapors. b) On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not document compliance with its chosen recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP), ANSI/ASHRAE-15 2004, Section 8.12(h), as the design of the non-Class 1, Division 2 refrigeration engine room ventilation system did not provide for the actuation of an alarm when the continuously run ventilation system fails. This condition exposed employees to inhalation of ammonia vapors. c) On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not document compliance with its chosen recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP), ANSI/IIAR-2 1999, Section A.3.8 when it did not clearly identify three switches of the break glass type at the entrances to the engine room. This condition exposed employees to inhalation of ammonia vapors. d) On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not document compliance with its chosen recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP), ANSI/ASHRAE-15 2004, Section 8.11.2 and ANSI IIAR-2 1999, Section 6.3.1.5 when the engine room was not constructed with tight-sealing doors. This condition exposed employees to inhalation of ammonia vapors. e) On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not document compliance with its chosen recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices (RAGAGEP), ANSI/ASHRAE-15 2004, Section 8.11.2 and ANSI IIAR-2 1999, Section 6.3.1.5 when the engine room was not provided with outward opening doors. This condition exposed employees to inhalation of ammonia vapors.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 D03 I B
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): The employer's piping and instrument diagrams were not accurate and did not represent equipment that was existing and was part of the process. On or about January 11, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the P&IDs were accurate and reflected the current process in that the P&ID-9 for the HTRL liquid line out and the HPL liquid line out does not show where it comes in from and where it goes out to.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 D03 I E
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(E): Information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include a ventilation system design. On or about January 11, 2017, the employer failed to provide and maintain an accurate and updated compilation of the ventilation design and design basis for the ammonia refrigeration engine room.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 F03
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3): The employer did not certify that operating procedures were current and accurate. On or about January 11, 2017, the employer failed to ensure that the procedures for draining oil pots were reviewed to reflect current operation practices. This condition exposes workers to inhalation hazards from a potential release of toxic ammonia vapors.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 J02
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $12,675 · Current $9,054 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2): The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going integrity of process equipment. On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not establish and implement written procedures to maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of the process including but not limited to: a. Safety cutouts. b. E-stop testing procedures. c. Level control pressure vessel test procedure.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $9054
- — C (S) $12675
- — Z (S) $12675
1910.119 J04 I
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i): The employer did not perform inspection and tests on process equipment. On or about January 11, 2017, in the ammonia refrigeration engine room, the employer failed to perform inspection and tests on process equipment such as, but not limited to: a) Compressor 8 oil pressure differential cutout (high & low). b) Compressor 9 high and low pressure cutout. c) Compressor 10 high temperature cutout. e) Emergency stop buttons inside and outside the engine room. This condition exposes workers to inhalation hazards from an uncontrolled release of toxic ammonia liquid and or vapors.
Recent events (3)
- — R (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.119 O04
- Issued
- Jun 16, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $7,243 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(4): The employer did not promptly determine and document an appropriate response to each of the findings of the compliance audit, and document that deficiencies have been corrected: On or about January 11, 2017, the employer did not ensure that an appropriate response was determined and documented for each of the findings contained in the 2016 PSM compliance audit for ammonia charging where employees were exposed to the inhalation hazards of ammonia.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $7243
- — Z (S) $7243
More inspections at Sanderson Farms, INC.
View Sanderson Farms, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 311615)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342024221.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.