Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: SCOTT'S CONTRACTING INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SCOTT'S CONTRACTING INC. in 658 RIDGEWOOD RD., MAPLEWOOD, NJ 07040 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342029030.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Scott'S Contracting INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Scott'S Contracting INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
658 RIDGEWOOD RD.
City
MAPLEWOOD
State
NJ
ZIP
07040
Mailing
538 GLEBE ST., ORANGE, NJ 07050
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,984 · Current $2,789 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical agents:      a) 658 Ridgewood Rd., Maplewood, NJ      Employees were using pneumatic nail guns to install roof and were not wearing eye protection.        Violation was observed on or about 12/30/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2788.8
  • · Z (S) $3984

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,984 · Current $2,789 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.       a) 658 Ridgewood Rd., Maplewood, NJ      Employees were exposed to an approximately 9-foot fall hazard to the ground as the ladder side rails did not extended at least 3 feet above landing surface.        Violation was observed on or about 12/30/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2788.8
  • · Z (S) $3984

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.   a) 658 Ridgewood Rd., Maplewood, NJ   Employees used the extension part of a portable ladder to climb on the roof approximately 9-foot above the ground surface.     Violation was observed on or about 12/30/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,243 · Current $2,789 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):       a) 658 Ridgewood Rd., Maplewood, NJ      Employees performing roofing work on multi-unit residential buildings approximately 10-feet above the ground surface were not protected from fall hazards.        Violation was observed on or about 12/30/2016.      The employer was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 925825, citation number 1, item number 2 and was affirmed as a final order on 08/19/2013, with respect to a workplace located at 28 Burnett Place, West Orange, NJ 07052.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2788.8
  • · Z (R) $7243

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342029030.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.