TOPSHAM, ME ·
OSHA Inspection: TEAM WOODYS PERFORMANCE CENTER
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TEAM WOODYS PERFORMANCE CENTER in 70 TOPSHAM FAIR MALL ROAD, TOPSHAM, ME 04086 (NAICS 441228). OSHA activity number 342030897.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEAM WOODYS PERFORMANCE CENTER
- Site address
- 70 TOPSHAM FAIR MALL ROAD
- City
- TOPSHAM
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04086
- Mailing
- 70 TOPSHAM FAIR MALL ROAD, TOPSHAM, ME 04086
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 441228
- Employees
- 17
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 8, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use. Battery acid filling area - The employer did not provide a means for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes within the work area for immediate emergency use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2173
- · Z (S) $3622
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $2,173 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Workshop - The rotating chuck on the lathe was not guarded to provide protection for the employees from rotating parts.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2173
- · Z (S) $3622
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $4,346 · Current $2,608 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections. Shop work bench - The side panel guard on the bench grinder was not installed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2608
- · Z (S) $4346
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,304 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(1)(ii): The required working space about electric equipment rated 600 volts, nominal, or less to ground, may not be used for storage. Electrical room - Christmas decorations were stored in front of two circuit breaker panels and one cut off switch.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1304
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $1,739 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employer did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use. Establishment - The employer did not provide safety data sheets in the workplace for each hazardous chemical used.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1739
- · Z (S) $2897
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area. Establishment - The employer did not provide employees with the information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work areas.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 10, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met. Establishment - The employer did not have a written hazard communication program.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1904.39 A02
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, within (24) twenty-four hours. Establishment - The employer did not notify OSHA within twenty-four (24) hours after the in-patient hospitalization of one of their employees.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $3622
1910.178 L06
- Issued
- Feb 24, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator had been trained and evaluated as required by paragraph (l) through a certification that included the name of the operator, the date of the training, that date of evaluation, and the identity of the person(s) performing the training or evaluation. Establishment - The employer did not have proof of documented certification for the powered industrial truck operator at the time of the inspection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 441228)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342030897.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.