Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MCW ACQUISITION, LLC

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MCW ACQUISITION, LLC in 614 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL 33301 (NAICS 238390). OSHA activity number 342035813.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MCW Acquisition, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MCW Acquisition, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
614 SOUTH FEDERAL HIGHWAY
City
FORT LAUDERDALE
State
FL
ZIP
33301
Mailing
1100 SW 30TH AVENUE, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33069
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238390
Employees
50
Ownership type
A

11 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $6,211 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:    On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold/Boatswains Chair which had been erected, moved, dismantled and altered, while not under the supervision and direction of a Competent Person (capable of identifying the known hazards of the system), and for which the scaffold system/Boatswain Chair was observed to have several safety deficiencies, therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $6211
  • — C (S) $8873
  • — Z (S) $8873

1926.451 D03 IX

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(3)(ix): Tiebacks were not secured to a structurally sound anchorage on the building or structure:  On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold/Boatswains Chair, which was suspended from a parapet clamp, for which the tieback(s) for the suspension device (parapet clamp) were not installed and/or were not secured to a structurally sound anchorage on the building or structure, therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.   NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 D05 III

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(d)(5)(iii):     Suspension scaffold support devices such as cornice hooks, roof hooks, roof irons, parapet clamps, or similar devices were not secured against movement by tiebacks installed at right angles to the face of the building or structure, or by opposing angle tiebacks secured to a structurally sound point of anchorage     On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold/Boatswain s Chair, which was suspended from a parapet clamp.  The single tieback employees used for the parapet clamp was not installed perpendicular to the face of the building.  Further the tieback was improperly attached to the front of the parapet, which created an unsound anchorage point for the tieback.  As a result, employees were exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:    On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed operating a suspension scaffold/Boatswains Chair, for which the safety belt which was incorporated into the chair rigging was not being utilized, therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Vertical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffold, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion:  On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were using Personal Fall Arrest Systems while working from suspension scaffold/Boatswains Chair for which the vertical lifelines were not protected from sharp edges and abrasion, and/or not fastened to a safe point of anchorage independent of the scaffold/Boatswains Chair, therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.  NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G03 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv): Vertical independent lifeline support lines were not attached to or use the same point of anchorage of the scaffold:  On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were using Personal Fall Arrest Systems while working from suspension scaffold/Boatswains Chair, for which the vertical lifelines were attached to the same anchorage point, therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.  NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D09

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(9): Lanyards and/or vertical lifelines did not have a minimum breaking strength of 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN):  On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed using a vertical/horizontal lifeline(s), which were tied-off (knotted) to a parapet clamp/support column or through/around a parapet wall, or for which the metal lanyard connection/hook was attached to the nylon lanyard strap (choked-back), resulting in the reduction of the lifeline or lanyard strength by 50 percent or more, (Ref: OSHA Appendix C to Subpart M), therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.  NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D23

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(23): Personal fall arrest systems were attached to guardrail systems or to hoists:    On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were using Personal Fall Arrest Systems while working from a rooftop/stairwell tower of a high rise building, for which the life line for the Personal Fall Arrest System was connected to/through the suspension device (parapet clamp) for the hoist/Boatswains Chair, therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (O) $0
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(ii): The employer did not assure that each employee, as necessary, had been trained by a competent person in the correct procedures for erecting, maintaining, disassembling and inspecting the fall protection systems to be used:  On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were observed using a Personal Fall Arrest System while working on a rooftop/stairwell tower of a high rise building, for which the employer had not provided the employees with adequate training by a Competent Person (capable of identifying the known hazards of the system); on the care, use, inspection and maintenance of the Conventional fall Protection (PFAS/guardrail/net), wherein the PFAS was not attached to a 5,000 pound anchor and/or was also not capable of preventing the employee form contacting the lower level, and/or preventing the employee from free falling more than six feet, and/or preventing the employee from exceeding 1800 pounds of force, (Ref: OSHA Subpart M), therefore exposing the employees to fall hazards.  NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $0
  • — C (S) $8873
  • — Z (S) $8873

1926.502 D20

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $6,211
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(20): The employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a fall or did not assure that employees were able to rescue themselves:    On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were using Personal Fall Arrest Systems while working on a rooftop/stairwell tower of a high rise building, for which the employer did not provide for prompt rescue of employees in the event of a suspended-fall, or did not assure that employees were able to rescue themselves (e.g. suspension trauma relief straps, signaling device, self-rescue devises, onsite equipment, technical rescue devices, etc.), therefore exposing the employees to post-fall injuries (suspension trauma/orthostatic shock) resulting from a fall.     Note: Suspension trauma/orthostatic shock can be fatal in as little as 10 minutes, and is typically fatal in 15 to 40 minutes.    NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (S) $6211
  • — C (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B01

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 9, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $17,745 · Current $12,422 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a walking/working surface with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:    On or about January 18, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, employees accessing the roof of a stairwell tower from an aerial lift; wherein the stair tower roof contained only a 18 inch parapet wall, and wherein the employees were dismounting the aerial lift, and then disconnecting their lanyards from the aerial life anchor, and then in-turn re-connecting their lanyards to an non-complaint anchor point (thought the parapet wall scupper drain), therefore exposing the employees to a fall hazard.    FIRST REPEAT: MCW ACQUISITION, LLC., and DBA METRO CAULKING & WATERPROOFING, LLC. was previously cited for a violation of this Occupational Safety and Health Standard 29 CFR. 1926.501(b)(1) and 1926.501(b)(10), or its equivalent standard, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 977396, citation number 01, Item number 001, and was affirmed as a final order on 09/04/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 133 Pompano Beach Blvd, Pompano Beach, FL 33062, and inspection number 957954, citation number 01, Item number 001, and was affirmed as a final order on 08/12/2014, with respect to a workplace located at 133 Pompano Beach Blvd, Pompano Beach, FL 33062.      NOTE: CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION OF ABATEMENT IS REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (3)
  • — J (R) $12422
  • — C (R) $17745
  • — Z (R) $17745

View MCW Acquisition, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342035813.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.