PLAINVILLE, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: DC ABRASIVE BLASTING & PAINTING, LLC
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of DC ABRASIVE BLASTING & PAINTING, LLC in 30 A&B HULTENIOS STREET, PLAINVILLE, CT 06062 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 342036217.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DC ABRASIVE BLASTING & PAINTING, LLC
- Site address
- 30 A&B HULTENIOS STREET
- City
- PLAINVILLE
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06062
- Mailing
- 30 A&B HULTENIOS STREET, PLAINVILLE, CT 06062
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use Paint Shop; On or about 1/19/17, the employer did not have a written respiratory program to cover the use of tight-fitting half face air purifying respirators used by employees who are prepping and painting. The chemicals used include xylene and isocyanates which cause central nervous system depression and skin/respiratory sensitization.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace Paint shop: On or about 1/19/17, an employee working in the paint shop was provided and required to use tight fitting half face air purifying respirators when painting was not provided a medical evaluation to ensure that using a respirator did not pose a health risk to the employee.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test Paint shop; On or about 1/19/17, employer did not provide a fit test to an employee required to wear a respirator while spray painting. Painting is done using materials that contain hexamethylene diisocyanate, which causes respiratory sensitization.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): On or about 1/19/17, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program to address employee exposure to chemicals used in the shop. Employees use xylene, a flammable solvent, and paints that contain isocyanates, which are skin and respiratory sensitizers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1500
- · Z (S) $2173
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section: Blasting shop; On or about 1/19/17, a drum of aluminum oxide did not have a label on it indicating the name of the material and the hazards associated with it.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Mar 6, 2017
- Abate by
- May 22, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Paint shop; On or about 1/19/17, the employer did not provide hazard communication training to employees exposured to chemicals used in the shop. Employees use xylene, a flammable solvent, and paints that contain isocyanates, which are skin and respiratory sensitizers.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342036217.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.