SANFORD, ME —
OSHA Inspection: FLEMISH MASTER WEAVERS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FLEMISH MASTER WEAVERS in 96 GATEHOUSE ROAD, SANFORD, ME 04073 (NAICS 314110). OSHA activity number 342038841.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLEMISH MASTER WEAVERS
- Site address
- 96 GATEHOUSE ROAD
- City
- SANFORD
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04073
- Mailing
- 96 GATEHOUSE ROAD, SANFORD, ME 04073
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 314110
- Employees
- 150
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.22 D02
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(2): The employer did not ensure hazardous conditions on walking-working surfaces were corrected or repaired before an employee used the walking-working surface again. When the correction or repair cannot be made immediately, the hazard was not guarded to prevent employees from using the walking-working surface until the hazard is corrected or repaired: Upper Creel Level - When correction or repair of the walking-working surface cannot be made immediately the hazard was not guarded to prevent employees from using the surface until the hazard was corrected or repaired.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
- — C (S) $12934
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(1): The employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces were inspected, regularly and as necessary, and maintained in a safe condition: Upper Creel Level - The employer failed to ensure that walking-working surfaces were inspected regularly and maintained in a safe condition.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
- — C (S) $12934
1910.22 D03
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Dec 6, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(d)(3): The employer did not ensure that , when any correction or repair involved the structural integrity of the walking-working surfaces, a qualified person performed or supervised the correction or repair. Upper Creel Level - A qualified person did not perform or supervise repairs made to the walking working surfaces.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $12934
- — Z (S) $12934
- — C (S) $12934
1910.22 A03
- Issued
- Oct 22, 2018
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $12,934 · Current $12,934
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(3): The employer did not ensure walking-working surfaces were maintained free of hazards such as sharp or protruding objects, loose boards, corrosion, leaks, spills, snow, and ice. Upper Creel Level - The employer did not ensure that walking-working surfaces were maintained free of hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (O) $12934
- — Z (O) $12934
- — C (O) $12934
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Jul 13, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,149 · Current $8,149
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly: Establishment - Portable fire extinguishers were not inspected on a monthly basis.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $8149
1910.22 B
- Issued
- Jun 9, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 26, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $114,074 · Current $12,934 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.22(b): The employer did not ensure that each walking-working surface can support the maximum intended load for that surface. Establishment - The employer did not ensure that the upper creel walkway could support the maximum intended load for that surface.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $12934
- — C (W) $114074
- — Z (W) $114074
More inspections at Flemish Master Weavers
View Flemish Master Weavers's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 314110)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342038841.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.