POMPANO BEACH, FL —
OSHA Inspection: FIVE STAR MILLWORK, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FIVE STAR MILLWORK, INC. in 4100 POWERLINE ROAD, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33073 (NAICS 321918). OSHA activity number 342041597.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FIVE STAR MILLWORK, INC.
- Site address
- 4100 POWERLINE ROAD
- City
- POMPANO BEACH
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33073
- Mailing
- 4100 POWERLINE ROAD SUITE Y4, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33073
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321918
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,802 · Current $2,281 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation: On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that employees wear personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, safety glasses or goggles, when they are engaged in spraying liquid chemicals containing toxic ingredients.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.2
- — Z (S) $3802
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,802 · Current $2,281 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but no limited to, xylene, acetone, toluene, and butanone, while performing spray applications as part of cabinetry fabrication operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2281.2
- — Z (S) $3802
1910.1200 F05
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
0040
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein: On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure labeling was affixed to a container of acetone that was used by employees during cabinetry assembly operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv) where topics of including, (i) Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (ii) The physical and health hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified, of the chemicals in the work area; (iii) measures and procedures to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, (iv) sections of the hazard communication program were discussed: On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop a training for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but no limited to, xylene, acetone, toluene, and butanone, while performing spray applications and assembly as part of cabinetry fabrication operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
004024602590
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not establish a written respiratory program with procedures for employees required to wear half mask respirators when engaged in spraying operations during cabinetry fabrication.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator, before the employees were fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees who are required to wear tight fitting half mask respirator when performing spray applications for cabinetry fabrication.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Jul 18, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: On or about January 19, 2017 at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not conduct fit testing for employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators, when performing spray applications during cabinetry fabrication.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321918)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342041597.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.