Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FIVE STAR MILLWORK, INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of FIVE STAR MILLWORK, INC. in 4100 POWERLINE ROAD, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33073 (NAICS 321918). OSHA activity number 342041597.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Five Star Millwork, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Five Star Millwork, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4100 POWERLINE ROAD
City
POMPANO BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33073
Mailing
4100 POWERLINE ROAD SUITE Y4, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33073
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321918
Employees
35
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,281 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee uses appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation:  On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure that employees wear personal protective equipment such as, but not limited to, safety glasses or goggles, when they are engaged in spraying liquid chemicals containing toxic ingredients.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.2
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,281 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop a written hazard communication program for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but no limited to, xylene, acetone, toluene, and butanone, while performing spray applications as part of cabinetry fabrication operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.2
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.1200 F05

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0040

29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(5): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and appropriate hazard warnings regarding the chemicals contained therein:  On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not ensure labeling was affixed to a container of acetone that was used by employees during cabinetry assembly operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Abate by
Sep 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3): The employee training did not include the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i) through (h)(3)(iv) where topics of including, (i) Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area (ii) The physical and health hazards, as well as hazards not otherwise classified, of the chemicals in the work area; (iii) measures and procedures to protect employees from exposure to hazardous chemicals, (iv) sections of the hazard communication program were discussed:  On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop a training for employees who use hazardous chemicals such as, but no limited to, xylene, acetone, toluene, and butanone, while performing spray applications and assembly as part of cabinetry fabrication operations.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 004024602590

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not establish a written respiratory program with procedures for employees  required to wear half mask respirators when  engaged in spraying operations during cabinetry fabrication.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees' ability to use a respirator, before the employees were fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about January 19, 2017, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide medical evaluations to employees who are required to wear tight fitting half mask respirator when performing spray applications for cabinetry fabrication.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 18, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about January 19, 2017 at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not conduct fit testing for employees required to wear tight-fitting respirators, when performing spray applications during cabinetry fabrication.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342041597.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.