Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GOETZ & SONS, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of GOETZ & SONS, INC. in 114 H R GIN ROAD, RAYVILLE, LA 71269 (NAICS 424590). OSHA activity number 342042751.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Goetz & Sons, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Goetz & Sons, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
GOETZ & SONS, INC.
Site address
114 H R GIN ROAD
City
RAYVILLE
State
LA
ZIP
71269
Mailing
PO BOX 607, RAYVILLE, LA 71269
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
424590
Employees
12
Ownership type
A

17 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,985 · Current $4,791 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that they were exposed to hazards associated with operating the forklift without using the seat belts.    On or about 1/25/17 in the Opening Department; the employer allowed employees, and the employees were observed operating the Toyota (Model #8FDU25, Serial # 31230) and the Hyster propane fork trucks without using the seat belts provided as a restraint device; thus exposing employees to serious injuries in the event of a tip-over.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4791
  • — Z (S) $7985

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,844 · Current $4,106 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.22(a)(1): The employer failed to provide a clean and sanitary condition for all places of employment, passageways, storerooms, service rooms, and walking-working surfaces.    On or about 1/25/17 in the main Gin Building entry and in the employee break room; the employer failed to clean the floors where an accumulation of trash and other debris was present; thus exposing employees to sanitation hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4106.4
  • — Z (S) $6844

1910.29 B01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $4,563 · Current $2,738 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.29(b)(1): The top edge height of top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, were not 42 inches, plus or minus 3 inches, above the walking-working surface:    a) On or about 1/25/17 at the guard rail around the Suction Fan Motor, the employer allowed employees to work and walk near the pit opening where the top rail was 36" high and the mid-rail was 19" above the floor.    b) On or about 1/25/17 at the guard rail around the air compressor near the Suction Fan Motor, the employees allowed employees to work and walk near the compressor where the top rail was 36" high and the mid-rail was 19" above the floor.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2737.8
  • — Z (S) $4563

1910.141 D01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,704 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(1): Washing facilities were not maintained in a sanitary condition:  On or about 1/25/17 in the Plant bathroom; the employer allowed employees to use the bathroom where the room was filthy; thus exposing employees to poor sanitation-related illnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5704

1910.141 D02 III

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(iii): Lavatories were not provided with hand soap or similar cleansing agent  On or about 1/25/17 in the Plant bathroom; the employer allowed employees to use the bathroom where the room was not provided with any hand soap or other cleaning agents; thus exposing employees to poor sanitation-related illnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 D02 IV

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(d)(2)(iv): Lavatories were not provided with individual hand towels or sections thereof, of cloth or paper, warm air blowers or clean individual sections of continuous cloth toweling:  On or about 1/25/17 in the Plant bathroom; the employer allowed employees to use the bathroom where the room was not provided with any hand towels; thus exposing employees to poor sanitation-related illnesses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,985 · Current $4,791 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:    On or about 1/25/17 in the Gin Mill at the Model 86 BesPress; the employer allowed employees to clean the press of cotton without using machine-specific lockout/tagout procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4791
  • — Z (S) $7985

1910.147 C06 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i): The employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually to ensure that the procedure and the requirement of this standard were being followed:  On or about 1/25/17 in the Gin Mill at the Model 86 BesPress; the employer allowed employer to clean the press requiring lockout/tagout procedures and the employer did not conduct a periodic inspection of the energy control procedure at least annually.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(iv): The employer shall certify that employee training has been accomplished and is being kept up to date. The certification shall contain each employee's name and dates of training.  On or about 1/25/17 in the Gin Mill at the Model 86 BesPress; the employer allowed employer to clean the press  requiring lockout/tagout procedures and the employer did not certify that employee training had been accomplished and kept up to date.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.178 L01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,844 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  On or about 1/25/17 in the BESPRESS and Opening departments; the employer allowed employees to operate the Toyota (Model #8FDU25, Serial # 31230) and the Hyster propane fork trucks and there was no employee training and evaluation documentation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6844

1910.178 Q01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,844 · Current $4,106 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(1): Any power-operated industrial truck not in safe operating condition was not taken out of service, and/or repairs were not made by authorized personnel:    On or about 1/25/17 in the BESPRESS department; the employees allowed employees to operate the Toyota propane fork truck (Model #8FDU25, Serial #31230) without a working horn; thus exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4106.4
  • — Z (S) $6844

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,985 · Current $4,791 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s)    On or about 1/20/17 in the Bailer Department; the employer allowed employees to use one-hand trip control on the Continental Press (BESPRESS) [Model 86] to allow the ram to complete descending to the top of the baled cotton while the press operator used the other hand to remove cotton from the top of the baler; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4791
  • — Z (S) $7985

1910.212 A05

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,704 · Current $3,422 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(5): Fan blade guards, where the periphery of the blades was less than seven feet above the floor or working level, had openings larger than one half inch:(a)(LOCATION)(IDENTIFY SPECIFIC OPERATION(S) AND/OR CONDITIONS)(DESCRIBE HAZARD(S) WHERE NECESSARY)    On or about 1/20/17 near the #2 Press, the employer allowed employees to use the floor fan and the fan did not have a guard over the fan blade; thus exposing employees to laceration/struck by rotating part injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3422.4
  • — Z (S) $5704

1910.219 D01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,985 · Current $4,791 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):    a) On or about 1/20/17 at the three Incline Cleaners (all attached); the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the pulleys were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.     b) On or about 1/20/17 at the Murray Press #2; the employer allowed employees to work at the Press where the pulleys were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.     c) On or about 1/20/17 at the #I,II and III Lint Cleaners; the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the pulleys were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.    d) On or about 1/20/17 at the Incoming Feeder machine; the employer allowed employees to work at the Feeder machine where the pulleys were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.    e) On or about 1/20/17 in the Opening Department at the Feeder machine; the employer allowed employees to work at the Feeder machine where the pulleys were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.    f) On or about 1/20/17 near the Suction Fan Motor; the employer allowed employees to work near the air compressor where the compressor pulleys were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4791
  • — Z (S) $7985

1910.219 E01 I

Serious Gravity 10 6 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt:  a) On or about 1/20/17 at the Murray Press #2; the employer allowed employees to work at the Press where the belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.   b) On or about 1/20/17 at the #I,II and III Lint Cleaners; the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.  c) On or about 1/20/17 at the Incoming Feeder machine; the employer allowed employees to work at the Feeder machine where the belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.  d) On or about 1/20/17 in the Opening Department at the Feeder machine; the employer allowed employees to work at the Feeder machine where the belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.  f) On or about 1/20/17 near the Suction Fan Motor; the employer allowed employees to work near the air compressor where the compressor belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 E03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(3)(i): Vertical or inclined belt(s) were not enclosed by guard(s) conforming to the requirements specified at 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  a) On or about 1/20/17 at the three Incline Cleaners (all attached); the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.  b) On or about 1/20/17 at the #I,II and III Lint Cleaners; the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the belts were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.219 F03

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jun 13, 2017
Abate by
Jun 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,985 · Current $4,791 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.219(f)(3): Sprocket wheels and chains which were seven -7 feet or less above floors or platforms were not enclosed:    a) On or about 1/20/17 at the three Incline Cleaners (all attached); the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the chain and sprocket were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.     b) On or about 1/20/17 at the #I,II and III Lint Cleaners; the employer allowed employees to work at the Cleaners where the chain and sprocket were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.    c) On or about 1/20/17 at the Incoming Feeder machine; the employer allowed employees to work at the Feeder machine where the chain and sprocket were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.    d) On or about 1/20/17 next to the BESPRESS machine; the employer allowed employees to work at the Bail Bagger machine where the chain and sprocket were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.    e) On or about 1/20/17 in the Opening Department; the employer allowed employees to work at the Feeder machine where the chain and sprocket were not guarded; thus exposing employees to amputation injuries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4791
  • — Z (S) $7985

View Goetz & Sons, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342042751.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.