WILTON, ME —
OSHA Inspection: MAINE MADE FURNITURE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MAINE MADE FURNITURE in 128 WELD ROAD, WILTON, ME 04294 (NAICS 337122). OSHA activity number 342043304.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAINE MADE FURNITURE
- Site address
- 128 WELD ROAD
- City
- WILTON
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04294
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 727, WILTON, ME 04294
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 337122
- Employees
- 9
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $815 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: Establishment - The employer did not have a written respirator protection program in place at the time of the inspection and had not implemented the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $815
- — Z (S) $1630
1910.134 K
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provide comprehensive, understandable training which did not occur annually and/or more often if necessary: Establishment - The employer did not provide respirator training to the employee. The employer requires the employee to use the respirator when performing production related spraying operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: Establishment - The employer did not provide a medical evaluation on an employee required to wear a respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator: Establishment - The employer did not ensure a fit test was conducted prior to the employees initial use of the respirator.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 337122)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342043304.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.