Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: AARON BROWN

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AARON BROWN in 77 LLOYD AVENUE, PROVIDENCE, RI 02906 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342055555.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Aaron Brown — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Aaron Brown is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
AARON BROWN
Site address
77 LLOYD AVENUE
City
PROVIDENCE
State
RI
ZIP
02906
Mailing
21 CROSS STREET, SMITHFIELD, RI 02917
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
7
Ownership type
A

18 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
May 2, 2017
Abate by
May 25, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  (a) Establishment:  As of May 1, 2017, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement had been completed for the violations from Inspection #1205555, issued on 02/07/2017, with a final order date of 03/22/2017.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, employees were not protected from overhead hazards while working belowsiding activities.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, eye and face protective equipment was not used when an employee was using a pneumatic nail gun.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.304 H01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.304(h)(1): Each circular crosscut table saw was not guarded by a hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw blade above the table and that portion of the saw above the material being cut:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, employees were not protected from injuries when working with a table saw that had the guard removed while cutting wood.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.403 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $2,716
29 CFR 1926.403(b)(2): Listed, labeled, or certified equipment was not installed and used in accordance with instructions included in the listing, labeling, or certification:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, an electrical power strip for indoor use only was not used in accordance with its listing or labeling.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.404 B01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, employees were not protected from electrical shock and burns while using electric equipment that was not GFCI protected.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.451(a)(1): Each scaffold and/or scaffold component was not capable of supporting, without failure, its own weight and at least 4 times the maximum intended load applied or transmitted to it:   (a) Worksite - Ladder-Jack Scaffold:  On or about 1/26/2017, the employer did not ensure that the erected Ladder-Jack scaffold plank was capable of supporting the intended load.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 B02 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2)(i): Each ladder jack scaffold, top plate bracket scaffold, roof bracket scaffold, and pump jack scaffold was not at least 12 inches (30 cm) wide:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017 an employee was working from a Ladder-Jack scaffold platform that was not a minimum of 12 inches wide.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, the employer did not ensure that the scaffold was bearing on base plates and mud sills or other adequate foundations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, proper access to the Pump-Jack or Ladder-Jack scaffolds was not provided.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration. Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, a Pump-Jack and Ladder-Jack scaffold system was not erected under the direction of a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, pump jack scaffold poles were not secured at the bottom.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(5): Scaffold platforms were bridged on to another:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while working from a Ladder-jack scaffold platform that was bridged onto another platform.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, an employee was not protected from falling while performing siding work from a roof approximately twenty feet above the lower level.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B15

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $3,803
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(15): Ladders were not inspected by a competent person for visible defects on a periodic basis and after an occurrence that could affect their safe use:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, employees were exposed to fall hazards from an extension ladder which had not been inspected for visible defects.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired:  (a) Worksite - Ladder-Jack supporting extension ladder:  On or about 1/26/2017, a portable extension ladder that was missing its footpads was not withdrawn from service.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:   (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, the employer did not provide adequate training for the employees who might be exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.1060 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Feb 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 24, 2017
Penalty
Initial $305 · Current $305
29 CFR 1926.1060(a): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders and stairways, as necessary, which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairways and train each employee in the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards:  (a) Worksite:  On or about 1/26/2017, the employer did not provide adequate training to employees who use ladders.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

View Aaron Brown's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342055555.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.