Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SUGAR CREEK PACKING CO. in 1600 W. MCKAY STREET, FRONTENAC, KS 66763 (NAICS 311611). OSHA activity number 342055589.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sugar Creek Packing CO. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sugar Creek Packing CO. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1600 W. MCKAY STREET
City
FRONTENAC
State
KS
ZIP
66763
Mailing
1600 W. MCKAY STREET, FRONTENAC, KS 66763
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311611
Employees
596
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,432 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open sided floor(s) or platform(s) 4 feet or more above the adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded by standard railings (or the equivalent as specified in 29 CFR 1910.23(e)(3)(I) through (v)), on all open sides:  Employees engaged in grease cleaning activities on top of the tank at the Water Treatment Plant by the grease tank were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 6 feet to the cement concrete floor below in that neither guard railing nor fall protection was provided.  29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $5432

1910.147 C05 II D

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout devices and tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s):  Water Treatment Plant - The Siemens Heavy Duty Safety Switch to control the hot water tank, the name on the lock could not be read to identify who put on the lock.  29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.157 E02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 5, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.157(e)(2): Portable fire extinguishers were not visually inspected at least monthly:  Water Treatment Plant Office - The portable fire extinguisher was not visually inspected monthly, it was missing inspection on November and December of 2016.  29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1) requires certification that the abatement of the above violation is complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Sugar Creek Packing CO.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342055589.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.