MILFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: MARKUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARKUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC in 131 MILFORD POINT RD., MILFORD, CT 06460 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342058369.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARKUS CONSTRUCTION, LLC
- Site address
- 131 MILFORD POINT RD.
- City
- MILFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06460
- Mailing
- 4 FRANK DR., SHELTON, CT 06484
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation. worksite: The employer did not ensure that employees who were required to use pneumatic nail guns while framing were provided with and required to wear eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1900
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,670 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b). Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were working/framing the residence under construction were protected from fall hazards above 6 feet by the use of guardrails, safety nets or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2670
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards. Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the employees who were exposed to fall hazards while framing the residence under construction at a height above 6 feet were trained in fall hazards and the procedures to be followed to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1900
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Mar 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards. Worksite: The employees, who were using a stepladder in the wrong position and unsafe manners were not trained by a competent person in the proper procedures to minimize the hazards associated with ladders.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B13
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $2,330 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(13): The top or top step of a stepladder was used as a step. worksite: The employees were using the top step of the stepladder to gain access to the upper landing of the residence under construction.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2330
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.1053 B04
- Issued
- Feb 15, 2017
- Abate by
- Feb 28, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(4): Ladder(s) were used for purposes other than the purpose for which they were designed, Worksite: The employer did not ensure that the 12-foot stepladder was used for the purpose in which it was designed.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Markus Construction, LLC
View Markus Construction, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342058369.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.