Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GKL GENERAL CONTRACTOR CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of GKL GENERAL CONTRACTOR CORPORATION in FARMALL LANE, BUILDING 2600, MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 342063732.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch GKL General Contractor Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for GKL General Contractor Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
FARMALL LANE, BUILDING 2600
City
MONROE TOWNSHIP
State
NJ
ZIP
08831
Mailing
3244 FRIENDSHIP ST., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19149
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,972 · Current $6,972
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): 29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used appropriate eye or face protection when exposed to eye or face hazards from flying particles, molten metal, liquid chemicals, acids or caustic liquids, chemical gases or vapors, or potentially injurious light radiation.  a) Farmall Lane, Building 2600, Monroe Township, NJ:  Employees, operating pneumatic nail guns while performing framing activities, were not wearing eye protection.  Occurred on or about 1/25/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6972

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,972 · Current $6,972
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where (a) portable ladder(s) was/were used for access to an upper level landing surface and the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed, the ladder was not secured at its top to a rigid support that will not deflect, and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.    a) Farmall Lane, Building 2600, Monroe Township, NJ:  Employees were using an aluminum extension ladder to access the third floor through a window opening and although a grasping device was present, the ladder was not secured in place.  This hazard was observed on 1/25/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6972

1926.1053 B16

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,972 · Current $6,972
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(16): Portable ladders with structural defects, such as, but not limited to, broken or missing rungs, cleats, or steps, broken or split rails, corroded components, or other faulty or defective components, were not either immediately marked in a manner that readily identifies them as defective, or tagged with "Do Not Use" or similar language, and were not withdrawn from service until repaired.  a) Farmall Lane, Building 2600, Monroe Township, NJ:   The aluminum extension ladder which was being used to access the third floor had damage, such as but not limited to a broken locked mechanism and broken foot, and had not been removed from service.  This hazard was observed on 1/25/17.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $6972

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 14, 2017
Abate by
Feb 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $19,520 · Current $19,520
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a) Farmall Lane, Building 2600, Monroe Township, NJ:  Employees engaged in residential framing activities while working from a steep pitched roof were exposed to fall hazards of up to 40 feet to the ground below and were not protected by an adequate fall protection system.  This hazard was observed on 1/25/17.  GKL General Contractor Corporation was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard 29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13), which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1171135, citation number 1, item number 1a, and was affirmed as a final order on 12/2/2016, with respect to a workplace located at Lot 29 Barkshire Boulevard, Middletown, DE.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $19520

View GKL General Contractor Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342063732.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.