PLEASANT VALLEY, MO —
OSHA Inspection: KAW SERVICES
Federal Agency inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a federal Agency health inspection of KAW SERVICES in 9100 W LIBERTY DR, PLEASANT VALLEY, MO 64068 (NAICS 811198). OSHA activity number 342070034.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- KAW SERVICES
- Site address
- 9100 W LIBERTY DR
- City
- PLEASANT VALLEY
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64068
- Mailing
- 9100 W LIBERTY DR, PLEASANT VALLEY, MO 64068
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Federal Agency (M)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811198
- Employees
- 46
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
11 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $5,070
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer does not have a written respiratory protection program in place to protect employees from known respiratory hazards such as overexposure to toxic chemicals, asphyxiation, and oxygen deficient atmospheres.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $5070
- — C (S) $5070
- — Z (S) $5070
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form: The employer is failing to protect employees from respiratory hazards. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer is not adequately identifying and evaluating respiratory hazards associated with the tank cleaning and servicing processes. The employer did not provide the necessary personal protective equipment in order to protect the employees from the contaminants chemical state and physical form. The environment inside the tank was not properly assessed prior to the employee starting the tank cleaning process.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $8873
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 D05 I
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(i): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not evaluate permit space conditions when entry operations were conducted by testing conditions in the permit space to determine if acceptable entry conditions existed before entry: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazardous atmospheres associated with permit required confined space entries. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer is not protecting employees during the process when requiring employees to break the plane several times throughout the tank cleaning without first testing the hazardous atmosphere.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with permit required confined space entries. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer is not posting signs on, or in the immediate area of, truck tank trailers to alert employees of the presence of permit required confined spaces.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $8873
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 D06
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(6): The employer did not provide at least one attendant outside the permit space into which entry was authorized for the duration of entry operations: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with permit required confined space entries. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer did not provide at least one attendant outside the permit-required confined space during entry operations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 D03
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $8,873
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with safe means of entry, procedures, and practices for employees to enter permit required confined spaces. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer is not protecting employees during the tank cleaning process in that the procedures developed by the employer do not identify conditions of breaking the plane with any part of the body, to include the face, as making entry into the permit-required confined space.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $8873
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 E01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $12,675
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(e)(1): Before entry was authorized, the employer did not document the completion of measures required by 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3) by preparing an entry permit: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with permit required confined space entries. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer is not protecting employees during the tank cleaning process when requiring employees to break the plane several times throughout the tank cleaning process for inspection purposes without first completing an entry permit.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $12675
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 G01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2018
- Penalty
- Initial $8,873 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(g)(1): The employer did not provide training so that all employees whose work was regulated by 29 CFR 1910.146 (permit required confined spaces) acquired the understanding, knowledge, and skills necessary for the safe performance of the duties assigned under 29 CFR 1910.146: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with permit required confined space entries. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer is not training employees to recognize that breaking the plane constitutes entry into a permit required confined space.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $8873
- — Z (S) $8873
1910.146 J04
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(j)(4): The employer did not ensure that each entry supervisor verified that rescue services were available and that the means for summoning them were operable: The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with permit required confined space entries. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer does not verify rescue services are available, and have the required equipment available, for a permit-required confined space entry prior to employees entering into a permit-required confined space.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6338
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.146 K01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $6,338 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(k)(1): An employer who designates rescue and emergency services, pursuant to paragraph (d)(9)of this section shall evaluate the prospective rescuer's ability by the criteria set in this section, (k)(1)(i) - (k)(1)(v). The employer is failing to protect employees from the hazards associated with permit required confined space rescue. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. The employer has not evaluated designated outside rescue services on their abilities to provide permit-required confined space rescues. a. Ability to respond to a rescue summons in a timely manner. b. Ability, in terms of proficiency with rescue-related tasks and equipment, to function appropriately while rescuing entrants from the particular permit space or types of permit spaces identified. c. Select a rescue team or service with the capability to reach the victim within a time frame that is appropriate for the permit space hazard identified and is equipped and proficient in performing the needed rescue services. d. Inform rescue team or service of the hazards they may confront when called on to perform rescue at the site. e. Provide the rescue team or service selected with access to all permit spaces from which rescue may be necessary so that the rescue service can develop appropriate rescue plans and practice rescue operations.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $6338
- — Z (S) $6338
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Jul 17, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 21, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(1): Electrical equipment was not free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: The employer is failing to protect employees from an electrical shock hazard. This was most recently documented on February 1, 2017 at 9100 West Liberty Drive, Pleasant Valley, Missouri 64068. Employees are exposed to 110 volt electrical shock hazard. Employees were using the intrinsically safe drop light for tank inspection in wet locations and the cord, repaired with electrical tape, was missing portions of the outer insulation. If the conductor insulation became compromised and contact made, the tank, catwalk, or other metal surface could become energized.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5070
- — Z (S) $5070
More inspections at KAW Services
View KAW Services's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811198)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342070034.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.