Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: TECHNOLOGY PLASTICS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of TECHNOLOGY PLASTICS, LLC in 75 NAPCO DRIVE, PLYMOUTH, CT 06782 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 342073368.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Technology Plastics, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Technology Plastics, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
75 NAPCO DRIVE
City
PLYMOUTH
State
CT
ZIP
06782
Mailing
75 NAPCO DRIVE, TERRYVILLE, CT 06786
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
20
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,897 · Current $2,028 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(1): The employer did not assess the workplace to determine if hazards are present, or are likely to be present, which necessitate the use of personal protective equipment (PPE):  Production area;  On or about 2/2/17, the employer did not assess the hazards present during various tasks and what personal protective equipment is necessary to protect employees.  Employees work at and on injection molding machines without any eye/face protection.  Mold release and cleaners, containing solvents such as toluene and trichloroethylene are used without any hand protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2027.9
  • — Z (S) $2897

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:  Production area:  On or about 2/2/17, the employer did not require eye protection to be worn in the production area.  Two instances where eye hazards existed were: 1. When the injection mold tools were opened for any reason during operation or maintenance 2. When the molds were cleaned using spray mold cleaner that contained solvents, such as toluene and trichloroethylene
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employees to use appropriate hand protection when employees hands were exposed to hazardous condition(s)  Production area;  On or about 2/2/17, the employer did not require hand protection to be worn in the production area when the molds were cleaned using spray mold cleaner that contained solvents, such as toluene and trichloroethylene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1048 D01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1048(d)(1)(i): Employees of a workplace covered by this standard were not monitored to determine their exposure to formaldehyde  Production area;  On or about2/2/17, employees working at or near injection molding tools using acetyl copolymer were not monitored for exposure to formaldehyde, which is a product of heating acetyl copolymer.  Sampling performed on 2/28/117 indicated that formaldehyde was produced during the process.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2535.4
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):    Production area;  On or about 2/2/17, the employer did not have a written hazard communication program.  Employees work at or near plastic injection molding machines that heat various plastics during the process, one of which, acetyl copolymer, gives off formaldehyde when heated.  Mold cleaners containing toluene and trichloroethylene are also used by employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2535.4
  • — Z (S) $3622

1910.1200 G08

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical, and did not ensure that they were readily accessible during each work  shift to employees when they were in their work area(s)  Production area;  On or about 2/2/17, the employer did not have safety data sheets available, upon request, for materials present in the workplace, including but not limited to mold cleaners containing toluene and trichloroethylene, and acetyl copolymer which produces formaldehyde when heated.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 27, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Production area;  On or about 2/2/17, employees had not received hazard communication training for chemical hazards in their work area, including formaldehyde, which is produced when acetyl copolymer is heated.  Toluene and trichloroethylene are also present in the mold cleaners used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Technology Plastics, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342073368.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.