OSHA Inspection: FINE LINE OF BOCA, INC.

Issued

Aug 3, 2017

Abate by

Aug 29, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about February 7, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not have a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear 3M 5200 Series Half Mask Facepiece Respirators in the workplace, while performing spray painting operations.

Issued

Aug 3, 2017

Abate by

Aug 29, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employees ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about February 7, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not provide medical evaluations prior to requiring employees to wear 3M 5200 Series Half Mask Facepiece Respirators in the workplace, while performing spray painting operations.

Issued

Aug 3, 2017

Abate by

Aug 29, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test:  On or about February 7, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not ensure fit testing was done for employees to wear 3M 5200 Series Half Mask Facepiece Respirators in the workplace, while performing spray painting operations.

Issued

Aug 3, 2017

Abate by

Aug 29, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  On or about February 7, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees performing spray painting operations, and who were required to work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene, and n-Butyl Acetate.

Issued

Aug 3, 2017

Abate by

Aug 29, 2017

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about February 7, 2017, at the above addressed worksite, the employer did not provide any effective information and training on hazardous chemicals  for employees performing spray painting operations, and who were required to work with hazardous chemicals, such as, but not limited to, Ethyl Benzene, Xylene, and n-Butyl Acetate.