Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MARKWEST UTICA EMG, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of MARKWEST UTICA EMG, LLC in 44200 CADIZ-STEUBENVILLE ROAD, CADIZ, OH 43907 (NAICS 324110). OSHA activity number 342087103.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Markwest Utica EMG, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Markwest Utica EMG, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
44200 CADIZ-STEUBENVILLE ROAD
City
CADIZ
State
OH
ZIP
43907
Mailing
43050 INDUSTRIAL PARK ROAD, CADIZ, OH 43907
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
324110
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1028 E01 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,667 · Current $2,934 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0320

29 CFR 1910.1028(e)(1): Exposure monitoring - General.     29 CFR 1910.1028(e)(1)(iii): Determinations of compliance with the short-term exposure limit (STEL) shall be made from 15 minute employee breathing zone samples measured at operations where there is reason to believe exposures are high, such as where tanks are opened, filled, unloaded or gauged; where containers or process equipment are opened and where benzene is used for cleaning or as a solvent in an uncontrolled situation. The employer may use objective data, such as measurements from brief period measuring devices, to determine where STEL monitoring is needed.    On or about February 7, 2017, the employer had not performed STEL exposure monitoring for laboratory operations in the condensate laboratory to determine accurately the airborne concentration of benzene for lab technicians and the lab manager.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2933.6
  • — Z (S) $3667

1910.1028 J03 III A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2017
Abate by
Oct 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,667 · Current $2,934 Reduced

Hazardous substances 0320

29 CFR 1910.1028(j)(3): Communication of hazards. Information and training.    29 CFR 1910.1028(j)(3)(iii): In addition to the information required under 29 CFR 1910.1200, the employer shall:    29 CFR 1910.1028(j)(3)(iii)(A): Provide employees with an explanation of the contents of this section, including Appendices A and B, and indicate to them where the standard is available; and    On or about February 7, 2017, the employer had not provided the information required for employees assigned to a work area where benzene was present. Employees, such as but not limited to laboratory technicians and the laboratory manager, were assigned to the condensate laboratory work area and had not received information regarding the contents of this section (the OSHA benzene standard to include Appendix A and B) and an indication of the OSHA benzene standard availability for the employees.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2933.6
  • — Z (S) $3667

1910.1028 J02 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2017
Abate by
Oct 2, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 0320

29 CFR 1910.1028(j): Communication of hazards -     29 CFR 1910.1028(j)(2): Warning signs and labels.    29 CFR 1910.1028(j)(2)(iii): The employer shall ensure that labels or other appropriate forms of warning are provided for containers of benzene within the workplace. There is no requirement to label pipes. The labels shall comply with the requirements of paragraph (j)(1) of this section and � 1910.1200(f).    On or about February 7, 2017, the employer did not ensure that labels (or other forms of warning) were provided for condensate sample bottles that are filled with condensate by plant operators, transported to the condensate laboratory and handled by laboratory employees, such as lab technicians. No form of label was placed onto these bottles that contain the condensate component benzene.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Markwest Utica EMG, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342087103.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.