Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: M-B COMPANIES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of M-B COMPANIES, INC. in 1200 S. PARK STREET, CHILTON, WI 53014 (NAICS 333120). OSHA activity number 342089885.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch M-B Companies, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for M-B Companies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
M-B COMPANIES, INC.
Site address
1200 S. PARK STREET
City
CHILTON
State
WI
ZIP
53014
Mailing
1200 S. PARK ST., CHILTON, WI 53014
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333120
Employees
100
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.36 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $4,156 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.36(d)(1): Employee(s) were not able to open an exit route door from the inside at all times without keys, tools, or special knowledge:  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, the emergency exit door from the big paint booth to the yard had a slide bolt on it to keep it shut that had to be hit with a 2 x 4 to get it to slide open during the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4155.6
  • — Z (S) $6926

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $4,156 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, the manometer was not operational in the big paint booth during the inspection which prevented the painter from being aware of the condition of the filtering system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4155.6
  • — Z (S) $6926

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6): Electrical wiring and equipment not subject to deposits of combustible residues but located in a spraying area as herein defined were not explosion-proof type approved for     Class I, group D locations and did not otherwise conform to the provisions of subpart S of this part, for Class I, Division 1, Hazardous Locations:  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, There was a broken light fixture in the SE corner of the ceiling with a plastic bag placed over it instead of being a sealed unit like the other lights in the booth.  b)    On or about 2/17/2017, There was general purpose conduit and fittings used in the booth running power to the Carbon Monoxide system in the paint booth.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 D12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
Aug 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(d)(12): Freshly sprayed articles were dried in spaces not provided with adequate ventilation to prevent the formation of explosive vapors:    a)    On or about 2/8/2017, Freshly sprayed parts were drying outside of the big paint booth in the balancer area without adequate ventilation to prevent over exposure to assemblers or excessive accumulation of flammable vapors.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 D01 III

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,926 · Current $4,156 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(d)(1)(iii): The employer did not identify and evaluate the respiratory hazard(s) in the workplace; including a reasonable estimate of employee exposures to respiratory hazards and identification of the contaminant's chemical state and physical form:  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, the employer had not done air monitoring to determine painters exposure levels to the paints and solvents used in the Big Paint Booth to determine whether the respirator was adequate.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4155.6
  • — Z (S) $6926

1910.134 E06 I

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(6)(i): The employer did not obtain from the physician or other licensed health care professional (PLHCP)  a written recommendation regarding the employee's ability to use the respirator: Note:  The recommendation shall provide only the following information: Any limitations on respirator use related to the medical condition of the employee, or relating to the workplace conditions in which the respirator will be used, including whether or  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, The employer had not provided a Medical Evaluation to the employees that were required to wear respiratory protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    a)    On or about 2/17/2017, The employer had not provided annual fit testing to the employees that were required to wear tight-fitting respirators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(2)(i): Respirators were not stored to protect them from damage, contamination, dust, sunlight, extreme temperatures, excessive moisture, and damaging chemicals or  were not packed or stored to prevent deformation of the face piece and exhalation valve:  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, respirators were not properly stored to protect them from damage and contamination. A respirator was found sitting in the open on a shelf in the big booth paint room during the inspection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 F06 II

Other-than-serious 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 27, 2017
Abate by
May 1, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6)(ii): Except as provided in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(7) and 29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(8), the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the product identifier and words, pictures, symbols, or combination thereof, which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, would provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical:  a)    On or about 2/17/2017, Diesel fuel was stored in two portable tanks outside of big paint booth without identification or hazard labels.  b)    On or about 2/17/2017, Antifreeze coolant was stored in un-marked gallon jugs without identification or hazard labels in the oil storage area along the east wall.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View M-B Companies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342089885.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.