Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRONTIER HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRONTIER HOMES AND DEVELOPMENT, INC. in 1107 GULF WAY BLVD, ST PETERSBURG BEACH, FL 33706 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 342092046.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Frontier Homes and Development, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Frontier Homes and Development, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1107 GULF WAY BLVD
City
ST PETERSBURG BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
33706
Mailing
PO BOX 4785, SEMINOLE, FL 33775
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a. At the perimeter of the building, employees of the stucco subcontractor were exposed to a fall hazard up to 25 feet high, in that, single plank, two plank and three plank platforms were used to reach elevations during stucco work, on or about 02/08/2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Employees on scaffolds more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in paragraphs (g)(1)(i)-(vii) of this section:  a. At the perimeter of the building, employees of the stucco subcontractor were exposed to a fall hazard up to 25 feet high, in that, a four frame scaffold erected to reach working elevations during exterior stucco work was not provided with standard railings at all areas.  1. At the north side of the building the scaffold had bridging from section to section at the second and third frame without fall protection. 2. At the perimeter of the building the scaffold end sections were open sided. 3. At the entire perimeter of the building the scaffold at the second and third frames had bracing as a top rail but did not have a midrail.   On or about 02/08/2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,803 · Current $2,282 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  a. West side of the building second and third floor balconies, employees of the stucco subcontractor were expose to a 19 foot fall hazard, in that, the balconies were open sided and employees working on the balcony as well as employees using the balconies to access the scaffold were not protected from falling to the ground below, on or about 02/08/2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.8
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.20 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Mar 15, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): A safety and health program was not initiated and/or maintained to provide compliance with the general safety and health provisions of the standard:     a. The employer did not develop and implement a safety and health program to address the company policy on safety as well as the employer/employee responsibilities, on or about 02/08/2017.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342092046.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.