CASEYVILLE, IL —
OSHA Inspection: TOM'S ROOFING & HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC DBA TOM'S ROOFING
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of TOM'S ROOFING & HOME IMPROVEMENT, LLC DBA TOM'S ROOFING in NEXT TO 301 FORREST OAKS DRIVE, CASEYVILLE, IL 62232 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342102241.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Site address
- NEXT TO 301 FORREST OAKS DRIVE
- City
- CASEYVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62232
- Mailing
- 2070 QUARRY RD, O FALLON, IL 62269
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 11
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,622 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: The employer did not initiate and maintain an accident prevention program to establish criteria for protecting employees from fall from heights and struck by hazards.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $3622
- — Z (S) $3622
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- May 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,897 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $2897
- — Z (S) $2897
1926.102 A02
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- May 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(2): Eye and face protection required by this Part did not meet the requirements specified in American National Standards Institute, Z87.1-1968, Practice for Occupational and Educational Eye and Face Protection: The employer did not ensure that employees working with pneumatically powered nail guns were wearing eye protection that met the requirements of ANSI Z87.1
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.152 D04
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- May 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.152(d)(4): At least one portable fire extinguisher having a rating of not less than 20B:C units was not provided on all vehicles used for transporting and/or dispensing flammable or combustible liquids: The employer did not ensure that a portable fire extinguisher was available to employees who were carrying a five (5) gallon gasoline can in the vehicle. The gasoline was being used to fill the air compressor.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $0
- — C (S) $5070
- — Z (S) $5070
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- May 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when eleven (11)workers were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately fourteen (14) feet off the roof eve when they were installing asphalt roofing shingles.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2535
- — C (S) $5070
- — Z (S) $5070
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Apr 10, 2017
- Abate by
- May 5, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $2,535 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails do not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access: The employer did not ensure portable ladders were constructed and placed so three (3) feet or more was extended above the upper landing. Workers performing residential construction were exposed to falling up to approximately fourteen (14) feet while using an extension ladder to ascend/descend from the roof to the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — F (S) $2535
- — C (S) $5070
- — Z (S) $5070
More inspections at Tom'S Roofing & Home Improvement, LLC DBA Tom'S Roofing
View Tom'S Roofing & Home Improvement, LLC DBA Tom'S Roofing's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342102241.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.