Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WATERBURY PLATING LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of WATERBURY PLATING LLC in P.O. BOX 2545 114 PORTER ST., WATERBURY, CT 06723 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 342107430.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Waterbury Plating LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Waterbury Plating LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
P.O. BOX 2545 114 PORTER ST.
City
WATERBURY
State
CT
ZIP
06723
Mailing
P.O. BOX 2545 114 PORTER ST., WATERBURY, CT 06723
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
Employees
33
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2017
Abate by
Jun 26, 2017
Penalty
Initial $8,873 · Current $6,211 Reduced
.29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through(o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:   Location:  114 Porter Street, Waterbury, CT  06723     An effective hearing conversation program was not administrated where by an employee sustained standard threshold shifts as documented on the 2016 OSHA 300 log.  An employee was exposed to noise levels above the time weighted average (TWA) of 85dBA.  On the first shift, a maintenance operator exposed to continuous noise at 97.9% of the permissible daily noise exposure 8.5 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.1 dBA during the 511 minute sampling period on 02/24/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6211.1
  • — Z (S) $8873

1910.95 I03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(i)(3): Employees were not given the opportunity to select their hearing protectors from a variety of suitable hearing protectors provided by the employer:   Location:  114 Porter Street, Waterbury, CT  06723   Only one choice of hearing protection was made available to employees where hearing protection was required.  On the first shift a maintenance operator exposed to continuous noise at 97.9% of the permissible daily noise exposure 8.5 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.1 dBA during the 511 minute sampling period on 02/24/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.95(k)(2): The training program was not repeated annually for each employee included in the hearing conservation program. Information in the training program was not updated to be consistent with changes in protective equipment and work processes:  Location:  114 Porter Street, Waterbury, CT  06723  Each employee was not trained annually where exposed to noise levels above the time weighted average (TWA) of 85 dBA.   On the first shift a maintenance operator exposed to continuous noise at 97.9% of the permissible daily noise exposure 8.5 hour time-weighted average sound level of 90 dBA or an equivalent sound level of approximately 89.1 dBA during the 511 minute sampling period on 02/24/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.133 A03

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 22, 2017
Abate by
Jun 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,661 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(3): The employer did not provide protective eyewear for employees who required prescription glasses.     Location: 114 Porter Street, Wallingford, CT    06723  Each employee required to wear safety glasses, including employees required to wear prescriptive eyewear, were not provided with protective safety glasses.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2661.4
  • — Z (S) $3802

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342107430.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.