NEW YORK CITY, NY —
OSHA Inspection: SSG LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SSG LLC in 270 RIVERSIDE DRIVE, NEW YORK CITY, NY 10004 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 342112083.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SSG LLC
- Site address
- 270 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
- City
- NEW YORK CITY
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 10004
- Mailing
- 259 STEPHENS STREET, BELLEVILLE, NJ 07109
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238190
- Employees
- 20
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 B01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $5,070
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii): a) At the jobsite, on the scaffolding, on or about 2/14/17: The employer did not ensure that a working platform on a scaffold was fully planked when workers were clearing ice from an adjacent gutter 11 stories from grade and 6 feet from the lower level. b) At the jobsite, on scaffolding located in the inside courtyard, on or about 2/14/17: The employer did not ensure that an access platform for a stair-tower was not fully planked 10 stories from grade and 6 feet from the lower level.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $5070
- — Z (S) $5070
1926.451 G04
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4): Guardrail systems installed to meet the requirements of this section did not comply with the provisions listed in subparagraphs (i) through (xv) of this paragraph. a) At the jobsite, on the scaffolding, on or about 2/14/17: The employer did not ensure that mid-rails were installed on scaffolding adjacent to working levels.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 B01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $5,070 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(1): The top edge height of the top rails, or equivalent guardrail system members, was not 42 inches (1.1 m) plus or minus 3 inches (8 cm) above the walking/working level: a) At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 2/14/17: A wire rope top-rail was measured at 24 inches and found to deflect more than 6 inches when tested. This section of guard rail was adjacent to a loading area 12 stories from grade.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $5070
1926.502 B02
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(b)(2): Midrails, screens, mesh, intermediate vertical members, or equivalent intermediate structure members were not installed between the top edge of the guardrail system and the walking/working surface when there was no wall or parapet wall at least 21 inches (53 cm) high. a) At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 2/14/17: A wire rope mid-rail was held down onto the deck by bags of roofing materials and subsequently not located at a midpoint between the top-rail and the roof deck.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D11
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(11): Lifelines were not protected against being cut or abraded: a) At the jobsite, on the penthouse roof, on or about 2/14/17: A lifeline was wrapped around steel I-beam as an anchorage, and the line was not protected from being cut or abraded against the steel edges.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2017
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. a) At the jobsite, on the roof, on or about 2/14/17: A lifeline was wrapped around steel I-beam and knotted as an anchorage, and the Competent Person could not establish if that knot was capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds and could not establish if the anchorage could otherwise maintain a safety factor of at least two.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at SSG LLC
View SSG LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238190)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342112083.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.