SAVANNAH, GA —
OSHA Inspection: ATLANTIC FREIGHT OF SAVANNAH, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ATLANTIC FREIGHT OF SAVANNAH, INC. in 760 KING GEORGE BOULEVARD SUITE A, SAVANNAH, GA 31419 (NAICS 488510). OSHA activity number 342112992.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ATLANTIC FREIGHT OF SAVANNAH, INC.
- Site address
- 760 KING GEORGE BOULEVARD SUITE A
- City
- SAVANNAH
- State
- GA
- ZIP
- 31419
- Mailing
- 760 KING GEORGE BLVD SUITE A, SAVANNAH, GA 31419
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488510
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.136 A
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,463 · Current $1,478 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.136(a): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee used protective footwear when working in areas where there is a danger of foot injuries due to falling or rolling objects, or objects piercing the sole, or when the use of protective footwear will protect the affected employee from an electrical hazard, such as a static-discharge or electric-shock hazard, that remains after the employer takes other necessary protective measures. a). Warehouse Area - On or about and times prior to February 13, 2017, protective footwear was not worn when employees manually handled freight, thus exposing employees to struck-by hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1477.8
- — Z (S) $2463
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not ensure that each operator had successfully completed the training consisting of a combination of formal instruction (e.g., lecture, discussion, interactive computer learning, video tape, written material), practical training (demonstrations performed by the trainer and practical exercises performed by the trainee), and evaluation of the operator's performance in the workplace. a). Warehouse Area - On or about and times prior to February 21, 2017, the employer did not ensure that each employee who operated a Toyota forklift truck (model: 8FGCU25) and/or a Caterpillar forklift (model: P7000-LP) had received formal instruction and evaluated for proficiency, thus exposing employees to a programmatic hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Mar 22, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 17, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service. a). Warehouse Area - On or about and times prior to February 13, 2017, a Toyota forklift truck (model: 8FGCU25) and a Caterpillar forklift (model: P7000-LP) were not inspected prior to use, thus exposing employees to a struck-by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488510)
More inspections in GA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342112992.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.