NEWTOWN, CT —
OSHA Inspection: FLIPS, LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FLIPS, LLC in 42 CURRITUCK ROAD, NEWTOWN, CT 06470 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 342120060.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FLIPS, LLC
- Site address
- 42 CURRITUCK ROAD
- City
- NEWTOWN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06470
- Mailing
- 3 WELDON WOODS ROAD, NEW FAIRFIELD, CT 06812
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236118
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.25 A
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,259 · Current $2,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures: JOBSITE: The employees, engaged in residential demolition and renovation activities were exposed to trip and fall hazards from debris, such as (but not limited to) scrap lumber, pieces of old siding, old roof paper, and old roof shingles that were scattered around the working/walking areas.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2200
- — Z (S) $3259
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): JOBSITE: The employees, engaged in renovation and cleaning debris on the low slopped roof of the residential house were not protected from the hazard of falling 8 feet 4 inches to the ground by the use of guardrails, personal fall arrest system or other equivalent means.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: JOBSITE: The employees, exposed to fall hazards while engaged in residential house renovation and cleaning debris on the low sloped (2 in 12 pitch) roof were not provided with training to recognize the hazards and procedures to minimize such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B05 I
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such than the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder way approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support: JOBSITE: The Werner 16-foot aluminum extension ladder, used to gain access to the roof of a residential house was used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the feet of the ladder was greater than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and top support).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1900
- — Z (S) $2716
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not ensure that each employee was trained by a competent person which would enable each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and stairs, and the procedures to follow to minimize those hazards. JOBSITE: The employees, using the Werner 16-foot aluminum extension ladder to access the roof were not trained in the proper means to erect the ladder, recognize hazards and the procedures to minimize any hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.21 B02
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.21(b)(2): The employer did not instruct each employee in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions and the regulations applicable to his/her environment to control or eliminate any hazards or other exposure to illness or injury: JOBSITE: The employer did not instruct employees on the recognition and avoidance of the hazards associated with demolition of residential house activities.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.404 B01 I
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1)(i): Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites. JOBSITE: A ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) or an assured grounding equipment program was not used with the electrical extension cord that powered a Porter Cable compressor, used to provide pneumatic power for nail guns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1926.850 A
- Issued
- May 19, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 15, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.850(a): An engineering survey was not performed by a competent person to determine the conditions of the framing floors and walls and the possibility of unplanned collapse of any portion of the structure prior to permitting employees to start demolition operations. JOBSITE: The employer did not have an engineering survey done by a competent person to determine the condition of the structure, perform preparatory operations tasks, such as (but not limited to) overall planning the work, methods and measures to be used, the equipment necessary, and prohibiting employees in the danger zones during the demolition operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236118)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342120060.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.