GRANDVIEW, MO —
OSHA Inspection: BALER SERVICE COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BALER SERVICE COMPANY in 14209 NORBY ROAD, GRANDVIEW, MO 64030 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 342120110.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BALER SERVICE COMPANY
- Site address
- 14209 NORBY ROAD
- City
- GRANDVIEW
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 64030
- Mailing
- 14209 NORBY ROAD, GRANDVIEW, MO 64030
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811310
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.101 B
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6: Employees were exposed to injury from a projectile hazard. A compressed gas cylinder of Argon, that was not in use, was not secured to prevent damage in accordance as required by Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965 in the welding area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1901.2
- — Z (S) $2716
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut: Employees were exposed to struck by hazards from an unguarded saw blade. The employer did not provide a guard for the unmarked table saw used in the maintenance area. The unguared saw blade extended 3 inches above the table.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.1
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.215 A02
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections: Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard. The employer did not provide a guard for the spindle end. The unguarded spindle end was discovered on grinder #2 in maintenance area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1141
- — Z (S) $1630
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch: Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard. The employer did not properly adjust the work rest. The improperly adjusted work rests were discovered in the following instances: 1) In the maintenance area, the Thor brand 6 inch bench grinder had its work rest adjusted to approximately 1/2 inch gap. 2) In the maintenance area, grinder #2, 6 inch pedestal grinder, had its work rest adjusted to approximately 1 ½ inch gap.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.1
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch: Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard. The employer did not properly adjust the tongue guards. The improperly adjusted tongue guards were discovered in the following instances: a) In the maintenance area, the Thor brand 6 inch bench grinder was missing the tongue guard resulting in an approximate 1 inch gap between the abrasive wheel and the grinder housing, exposing employees to a struck by hazard. b) In the maintenance area, grinder #2, 6 inch pedestal grinder, was missing the tongue guard resulting in an approximate 3 inch gap between the abrasive wheel and the grinder housing, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1521.1
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket): Employees were exposed to an electrical shock hazard from a damaged cord. The employer did not inspect the cord to ensure it was free from damage. The damaged cord was discovered on grinder #2 in the maintenance area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1141
- — Z (S) $1630
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii): Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals. The employer did not develop or implement a Hazard Communication program. Employees throughout the facility were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to paint, hydraulic oil and purple power cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2173
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 10, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 6, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: Employees were exposed to injury/illness from dermal, ingestion, and inhalation hazards from exposure to hazardous chemicals. Training had not been provided to ensure that employees were aware of the hazards associated with the chemicals with which they work. Hazardous chemicals used in the facility included but were not limited to paint, hydraulic oil and purple power cleaner.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $2173
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811310)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342120110.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.