Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: BALER SERVICE COMPANY

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BALER SERVICE COMPANY in 14209 NORBY ROAD, GRANDVIEW, MO 64030 (NAICS 811310). OSHA activity number 342120110.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Baler Service Company — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Baler Service Company is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
14209 NORBY ROAD
City
GRANDVIEW
State
MO
ZIP
64030
Mailing
14209 NORBY ROAD, GRANDVIEW, MO 64030
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.101 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,901 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6:  Employees were exposed to injury from a projectile hazard.  A compressed gas cylinder of Argon, that was not in use, was not secured to prevent damage in accordance as required by Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965 in the welding area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1901.2
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.213 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut:  Employees were exposed to struck by hazards from an unguarded saw blade.  The employer did not provide a guard for the unmarked table saw used in the maintenance area.  The unguared saw blade extended 3 inches above the table.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1521.1
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.215 A02

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(2): Abrasive wheel(s) used on grinding machinery were not provided with safety guard(s) which covered the spindle end, nut, flange projections:  Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard.  The employer did not provide a guard for the spindle end.  The unguarded spindle end was discovered on grinder #2 in maintenance area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1141
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.215 A04

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(a)(4): Work rest(s) on grinding machinery were not adjusted closely to the wheel with a maximum opening of one eighth inch:   Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard.  The employer did not properly adjust the work rest.  The improperly adjusted work rests were discovered in the following instances:  1) In the maintenance area, the Thor brand 6 inch bench grinder had its work rest adjusted to approximately 1/2 inch gap.  2) In the maintenance area, grinder #2, 6 inch pedestal grinder,  had its work rest adjusted to approximately 1 ½ inch gap.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1521.1
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.215 B09

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,521 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.215(b)(9): The distance between the abrasive wheel periphery(s) and the adjustable tongue or the end of the safety guard peripheral member at the top exceeded one fourth inch:  Employees were exposed to a struck by hazard.  The employer did not properly adjust the tongue guards.  The improperly adjusted tongue guards were discovered in the following instances:  a) In the maintenance area, the Thor brand 6 inch bench grinder was missing the tongue guard resulting in an approximate 1 inch gap between the abrasive wheel and the grinder housing, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.    b) In the maintenance area, grinder #2, 6 inch pedestal grinder, was missing the tongue guard resulting in an approximate 3 inch gap between the abrasive wheel and the grinder housing, exposing employees to a struck by hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1521.1
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.334 A02 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $1,630 · Current $1,141 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(i): Portable cord and plug connected equipment and flexible cord sets (extension cords) were not visually inspected before use on any shift for external defects (such as loose parts, deformed and missing pins, or damage to outer jacket or insulation) and for evidence of possible internal damage (such as pinched or crushed outer jacket):  Employees were exposed to an electrical shock hazard from a damaged cord.  The employer did not inspect the cord to ensure it was free from damage.  The damaged cord was discovered on grinder #2 in the maintenance area.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1141
  • — Z (S) $1630

1910.1200 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   Employees were exposed to hazardous chemicals.  The employer did not develop or implement a Hazard Communication program.  Employees throughout the facility were exposed to hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to paint, hydraulic oil and purple power cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.1200 H01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 10, 2017
Abate by
Jun 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees were exposed to injury/illness from dermal, ingestion, and inhalation hazards from exposure to hazardous chemicals.  Training had not been provided to ensure that employees were aware of the hazards associated with the chemicals with which they work.  Hazardous chemicals used in the facility included but were not limited to paint, hydraulic oil and purple power cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $2173

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342120110.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.