Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,645Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-16 Last loaded 2026-07-20

OSHA Inspection: LEON AMBROSIO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEON AMBROSIO in CORNER OF INVERNESS CIRCLE AND WINGED FOOT DRIVE, OREGON, WI 53575 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342123833.

Watch Leon Ambrosio — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Leon Ambrosio is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LEON AMBROSIO
Site address
CORNER OF INVERNESS CIRCLE AND WINGED FOOT DRIVE
City
OREGON
State
WI
ZIP
53575
Mailing
201 KURT DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53714
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $305.00 · Current $305.00
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:  a) The employer did not provide, along with the corrective action worksheet as required by 29CFR 1903.19(c)(1), documentation of abatement for citations regarding lack of fall protection, not providing training to employees on fall protection, using anchorage points not designed for their intended use, and using body belts as a part of a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $305

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $3803.00 · Current $2848.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m)  or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502:    On or about February 22, 2017, employees installing weatherproofing material such as but not limited to felt paper on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2848
  • — Z (S) $3803

1926.503 A02 VIII

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2716.00 · Current $1715.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): The employer shall assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in the following areas: The standards contained in subpart M.    On or about February 22, 2017, the employees on site were not familiar with the OSHA fall protection standards and the requirements held within.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1715
  • — Z (S) $2716

1926.502 D15

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person.    On or about February 22, 2017, employees installing weatherproofing material such as but not limited to felt paper on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were utilizing anchorage not intended for design / use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.502 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $0.00 · Current $0.00
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:Note:  The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section.    On or about February 22, 2017, employees installing weatherproofing material such as but not limited to felt paper on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were utilizing body belts as part of a fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342123833.