OREGON, WI ·
OSHA Inspection: LEON AMBROSIO
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of LEON AMBROSIO in CORNER OF INVERNESS CIRCLE AND WINGED FOOT DRIVE, OREGON, WI 53575 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 342123833.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- LEON AMBROSIO
- Site address
- CORNER OF INVERNESS CIRCLE AND WINGED FOOT DRIVE
- City
- OREGON
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53575
- Mailing
- 201 KURT DRIVE, MADISON, WI 53714
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- May 8, 2017
- Abate by
- Jun 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $305 · Current $305
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: a) The employer did not provide, along with the corrective action worksheet as required by 29CFR 1903.19(c)(1), documentation of abatement for citations regarding lack of fall protection, not providing training to employees on fall protection, using anchorage points not designed for their intended use, and using body belts as a part of a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $305
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $3,803 · Current $2,848 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: On or about February 22, 2017, employees installing weatherproofing material such as but not limited to felt paper on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were doing so without fall protection.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2848
- · Z (S) $3803
1926.503 A02 VIII
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,716 · Current $1,715 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): 29 CFR 1926.503(a)(2)(viii): The employer shall assure that each employee has been trained, as necessary, by a competent person qualified in the following areas: The standards contained in subpart M. On or about February 22, 2017, the employees on site were not familiar with the OSHA fall protection standards and the requirements held within.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1715
- · Z (S) $2716
1926.502 D15
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(15): Anchorage used for attachment for personal fall arrest equipment was not capable of supporting at least 5,000 pounds (22.2 kN) per employee attached nor was it designed, installed and used as follows: As part of a complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a safety factor of at least two; and under the supervision of a qualified person. On or about February 22, 2017, employees installing weatherproofing material such as but not limited to felt paper on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were utilizing anchorage not intended for design / use.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.502 D
- Issued
- Mar 2, 2017
- Abate by
- Apr 14, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d): The employer used body belts as part of a personal fall arrest system:Note: The use of a body belt in a positioning device system is acceptable and is regulated under paragraph (e) of this section. On or about February 22, 2017, employees installing weatherproofing material such as but not limited to felt paper on a residential roof at a height greater than six feet were utilizing body belts as part of a fall arrest system.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 342123833.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.