Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RAND MACHINE & FABRICATION COMPANY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RAND MACHINE & FABRICATION COMPANY, LLC in 1486 HIGHLAND AVENUE BUILDING 2 UNIT #9, CHESHIRE, CT 06410 (NAICS 332710). OSHA activity number 342128121.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rand Machine & Fabrication Company, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rand Machine & Fabrication Company, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1486 HIGHLAND AVENUE BUILDING 2 UNIT #9
City
CHESHIRE
State
CT
ZIP
06410
Mailing
1486 HIGHLAND AVENUE BUILDING2 UNIT #9, CHESHIRE, CT 06410
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332710
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
May 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,173 · Current $1,087 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures shall be developed, documented and utilized for the control of potentially hazardous energy when employees are engaged in the activities covered by this section.     WORKSHOP: The employer had not established and implemented written step-by-step energy control procedures in the machine specific for the employee during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the Monarch VMC 45 milling machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1086.5
  • — Z (S) $2173

1910.147 C07 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
May 3, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i): The employer shall provide training to ensure that the purpose and function of the energy control program are understood by employees and that the knowledge and skills required for the safe application, usage, and removal of the energy controls are acquired by employees.   WORKSHOP:   The employees, as affected and/or other types were not provided with training and information in the controlling of potentially hazardous and unexpected releases of energy sources (lo/to) during servicing and maintenance of equipment, such as (but not limited to) the Monarch VMC 45 milling machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,716 · Current $1,358 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    WORKSHOP:  The rotating spindles of the following milling machines were unguarded:      1.      Trak DPM .  2.      Sports K3 SouthWest Industries.  3.      Two Trak 3, SouthWest Industries.  4.      Trak FHM 7 SouthWest Industries.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1358
  • — Z (S) $2716

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 17, 2017
Abate by
Mar 29, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.  WORKSHOP:  The employer had not verified through a written certification that the workplace hazard assessment for personal protective equipment (PPE) had been performed as complete.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342128121.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.