Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: HEGLAR CREEK ELECTRIC, LLC

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HEGLAR CREEK ELECTRIC, LLC in 610 OVERLAND, BURLEY, ID 83318 (NAICS 238210). OSHA activity number 342132313.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Heglar Creek Electric, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Heglar Creek Electric, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
610 OVERLAND
City
BURLEY
State
ID
ZIP
83318
Mailing
289 CENTENNIAL DR, HEYBURN, ID 83336
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238210
Employees
13
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there is a possible danger of head injury from impact, or from falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock or burns; were not protected by protective helmets:  (a)  On or about February 22, 2017, and at times prior thereto, two employees observed installing a parking lot light; the apprentice worked out of  the approximately 20 foot elevated aerial lift utilizing small hand tools while the journeyman worked directly underneath and exposed to an overhead hazard.   Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2535.4
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.102 A03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(3): The employer did not ensure that each affected employee who wears prescription lenses while engaged in operations that involve eye hazards wears eye protection that incorporates the prescription in its design, or wears eye protection that can be worn over the prescription lenses without disturbing the proper position of the prescription lenses or the protective lenses.  (a)  On or about February 22, 2017, and at times prior thereto, an employee working out of an aerial lift utilizing small hand tools did not have protective safety glasses donned.  Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.453 B02 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,622 · Current $2,535 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.453(b)(2)(v): A body belt with lanyard attached to the boom or basket was not worn by employee(s) working from an aerial lift:  (a) On or about February 22, 2017, and at times prior thereto, an employee without a personal fall arrest system was observed working in an aerial lift that was extended approximately 20 feet above ground.    Note (1):  As of January 1, 1998, subpart M of this part (1926.502(d)) provides that body belts are not acceptable as part of a personal fall arrest system.  The use of a body belt in a tethering system or in a restraint system is acceptable and is regulated under 1926.502(e).  Note (2): Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2535.4
  • — Z (S) $3622

1926.454 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 7, 2017
Abate by
Mar 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a): The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  (a)  On or about February 22, 2017, and at times prior thereto, an employee observed working at elevated heights in an aerial lift without the use of fall protection demonstrated the lack of understanding of the hazards associated and/or the awareness of how to control and/or minimize the risk of the potential fall hazard.  Note: Abatement certification IS required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342132313.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.