Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CHARLES INDUSTRIES, LTD.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CHARLES INDUSTRIES, LTD. in 16265 E NATIONAL DR., MARSHALL, IL 62441 (NAICS 334210). OSHA activity number 342134012.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Charles Industries, LTD. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Charles Industries, LTD. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
16265 E NATIONAL DR.
City
MARSHALL
State
IL
ZIP
62441
Mailing
16265 E NATIONAL DR., MARSHALL, IL 62441
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
334210
Employees
89
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.37 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 89 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,432 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.37(a)(3): Exit route(s) were not kept free and unobstructed:    On or about February 27, 2017, employees were exposed to physical hazards because the two exit routes, on the north side of the building, were blocked with a chair, stored steel sheets, and a tooling cart.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $5432

1910.147 C04 II B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Abate by
May 12, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,054 · Current $6,338 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(B): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy:     On or about February 27, 2017, Charles Industries, Ltd. had employees exposed to amputation hazards, due to the use of machine specific energy control procedures that did not have specific steps for shutting down, isolating, blocking and securing machines or equipment to control hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $6337.8
  • — Z (S) $9054

1910.147 C04 II D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Abate by
Apr 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(ii)(D): The energy control procedures did not clearly and specifically outline the requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control:  On or about February 27, 2017, Charles Industries, Ltd. had employees exposed to amputation hazards, due to the use of machine specific energy control procedures that did not contain specific requirements for testing a machine or equipment to determine and verify the effectiveness of lockout devices, tagout devices, and other energy control measures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 C07 I A

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(7)(i)(A): Authorized employee(s) did not receive training in the recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources, the type and magnitude of the energy available in the workplace, and the methods and means necessary for energy isolation:       On or about February 27, 2017, Charles Industries, Ltd. had employees exposed to amputation hazards during tooling/die changes in three Amada manufactured hydraulic press brakes, and the employer did not provide the operators with the level of lockout training required for Authorized Employees.  This training would include the following:      a. Recognition of applicable hazardous energy sources,   b. Magnitude of the energy available in the work place, and   c. Methods and means necessary for energy isolation and control.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.147 D02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Abate by
May 19, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,675 · Current $12,675
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(2): An orderly shutdown of machine or equipment was not utilized to avoid any additional or increased hazards to employees as a result of equipment stoppage:        On or about February 27, 2017, Charles Industries, Ltd. had employees exposed to amputation hazards during tooling/die changes in three Amada manufactured hydraulic press brakes, and the employer did not have the employees shut down/turn off the press brakes prior to changing the tooling/dies in the press brakes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $12675
  • — Z (S) $12675

1910.147 D03

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(3): All energy isolating devices that were needed to control the energy to the machine or equipment were not physically located and operated in such a manner as to isolate the machine or equipment from the energy source(s):       On or about February 27, 2017, Charles Industries, Ltd. had employees exposed to amputation hazards during tooling/die changes in three Amada manufactured hydraulic press brakes, and the employer did not have employees operate hazardous energy devices associated with the press brakes, in order to control all hazardous energy,  prior to changing the tooling/dies in the press brakes.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.147 D04 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Apr 6, 2017
Abate by
Apr 17, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lockout or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees:        On or about February 27, 2017, Charles Industries, Ltd. had employees exposed to amputation hazards during tooling/die changes in three Amada manufactured hydraulic press brakes, and the employer did not have employees apply lockout devices to each energy isolating device prior to changing the tooling/dies, in order to control all hazardous energy.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

View Charles Industries, LTD.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 342134012.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.